» Articles » PMID: 25177235

The Role of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Evaluating the Response to Tyrosine-kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Radiol Oncol
Publisher Sciendo
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2014 Sep 2
PMID 25177235
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used in the evaluation of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), primarily for staging purposes. The aim of this paper is to perform a systematic review about the usefulness of PET-CT using FDG in response assessment after treatment with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced RCC.

Materials And Methods: The scientific literature about the role of PET-CT using FDG in the assessment of response to treatment with TKIs in patients affected by advanced RCC was systematically reviewed.

Results: Seven studies about the role of PET-CT using FDG in the response assessment after treatment with TKIs (essentially sunitinib and sorafenib) in advanced RCC were retrieved in full-text and analysed, to determine the predictive role of this morpho-functional imaging method on patient outcome.

Conclusions: To date, the role of PET-CT using FDG in evaluating the response to TKIs in metastatic RCC patients is still not well defined, partly due to heterogeneity of available studies; however, PET-CT reveals potential role for the selection of patients undergoing therapy with TKIs. The use of contrast-enhanced PET-CT appears to be promising for a "multi-dimensional" evaluation of treatment response in these patients.

Citing Articles

Advances in Imaging-Based Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Critical Analysis of the Current Literature.

Calderon L, Eismann L, Reese S, Reznik E, Hakimi A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672304 PMC: 9856305. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020354.


Recent advances in imaging techniques of renal masses.

Aggarwal A, Das C, Sharma S World J Radiol. 2022; 14(6):137-150.

PMID: 35978979 PMC: 9258310. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i6.137.


Early Predictive Response to Multi-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced Refractory Radioactive-Iodine Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A New Challenge for [F]FDG PET/CT.

Ferrari C, Santo G, Ruta R, Lavelli V, Rubini D, Mammucci P Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34441351 PMC: 8392185. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081417.


Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma.

Jena R, Narain T, Singh U, Srivastava A Indian J Urol. 2021; 37(2):125-132.

PMID: 34103794 PMC: 8173953. DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_268_20.


Renal Cell Carcinoma: the Oncologist Asks, Can PSMA PET/CT Answer?.

Pozzessere C, Bassanelli M, Ceribelli A, Rasul S, Li S, Prior J Curr Urol Rep. 2019; 20(11):68.

PMID: 31605269 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0938-9.


References
1.
Khandani A, Cowey C, Moore D, Gohil H, Rathmell W . Primary renal cell carcinoma: relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and response to neoadjuvant sorafenib. Nucl Med Commun. 2012; 33(9):967-73. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283561837. View

2.
Segota E, Mekhail T, Olencki T, Hutson T, Dreicer R, Wacker B . Phase II trial of capecitabine and rHu-interferon-alpha-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, limited efficacy, and moderate toxicity. Urol Oncol. 2007; 25(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.02.016. View

3.
Wang H, Ding H, Chen J, Chao C, Lu Y, Lin W . Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging. 2012; 12:464-74. PMC: 3483599. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042. View

4.
Motzer R, Bander N, Nanus D . Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(12):865-75. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199609193351207. View

5.
Whiting P, Weswood M, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J . Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:9. PMC: 1421422. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9. View