» Articles » PMID: 25173799

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Along the Continuum of HIV Care: How Can We Optimize the Effect of HIV Treatment As Prevention Programs?

Overview
Publisher Current Science
Date 2014 Sep 1
PMID 25173799
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cascade of HIV care has been proposed as a useful tool to monitor health system performance across the key stages of HIV care delivery to reduce morbidity, mortality, and HIV transmission, the focal points of HIV Treatment as Prevention campaigns. Interventions to improve the cascade at its various stages may vary substantially in their ability to deliver health value per amount expended. In order to meet global antiretroviral treatment access targets, there is an urgent need to maximize the value of health spending by prioritizing cost-effective interventions. We executed a literature review on economic evaluations of interventions to improve specific stages of the cascade of HIV care. In total, 33 articles met the criteria for inclusion in the review, 22 (67 %) of which were published within the last 5 years. Nonetheless, substantial gaps in our knowledge remain, particularly for interventions to improve linkage and retention in HIV care in developed and developing-world settings and generalized and concentrated epidemics. We make the case here that the attention of scientists and policymakers needs to turn to the development, implementation, and rigorous evaluation of interventions to improve the various stages of the cascade of HIV care.

Citing Articles

Translating and disseminating a localised economic model to support implementation of the 'Ending the HIV Epidemic' initiative to public health policymakers.

Abrams M, Weiner J, Piske M, Enns B, Krebs E, Zang X Evid Policy. 2024; 19(4):554-571.

PMID: 38313044 PMC: 10836837. DOI: 10.1332/174426421x16875142087569.


A qualitative model of the HIV care continuum in Vancouver, Canada.

Wai B, Vasarhelyi K, Rutherford A, Buchner C, Gustafson R, Compton M Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022; 11(2):84-97.

PMID: 35655610 PMC: 9154767. DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1906762.


Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Retention and Re-engagement Interventions in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review.

Wheatley M, Knowlton G, Butler M, Enns E AIDS Behav. 2022; 26(7):2159-2168.

PMID: 35076798 PMC: 10478035. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03561-w.


The Cost-Effectiveness of HIV/STI Prevention in High-Income Countries with Concentrated Epidemic Settings: A Scoping Review.

Brunner P, Brunner K, Kubler D AIDS Behav. 2022; 26(7):2279-2298.

PMID: 35034238 PMC: 9163023. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03583-y.


Cost-effectiveness of a Medical Care Coordination Program for People With HIV in Los Angeles County.

Flash M, Garland W, Martey E, Schackman B, Oksuzyan S, Scott J Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020; 6(12):ofz537.

PMID: 31909083 PMC: 6935680. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz537.


References
1.
Cremin I, Alsallaq R, Dybul M, Piot P, Garnett G, Hallett T . The new role of antiretrovirals in combination HIV prevention: a mathematical modelling analysis. AIDS. 2013; 27(3):447-58. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835ca2dd. View

2.
Schackman B, Metsch L, Colfax G, Leff J, Wong A, Scott C . The cost-effectiveness of rapid HIV testing in substance abuse treatment: results of a randomized trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 128(1-2):90-7. PMC: 3546145. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.009. View

3.
Ownby R, Waldrop-Valverde D, Jacobs R, Acevedo A, Caballero J . Cost effectiveness of a computer-delivered intervention to improve HIV medication adherence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13:29. PMC: 3599639. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-29. View

4.
Shrestha R, Clark H, Sansom S, Song B, Buckendahl H, Calhoun C . Cost-effectiveness of finding new HIV diagnoses using rapid HIV testing in community-based organizations. Public Health Rep. 2009; 123 Suppl 3:94-100. PMC: 2567009. DOI: 10.1177/00333549081230S312. View

5.
Dowdy D, Rodriguez R, Hare C, Kaplan B . Cost-effectiveness of targeted human immunodeficiency virus screening in an urban emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18(7):745-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01110.x. View