» Articles » PMID: 25172476

Genetics of Gene Expression in CNS

Overview
Date 2014 Aug 31
PMID 25172476
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcriptome studies have revealed a surprisingly high level of variation among individuals in expression of key genes in the CNS under both normal and experimental conditions. Ten-fold variation is common, yet the specific causes and consequences of this variation are largely unknown. By combining classic gene mapping methods-family linkage studies and genomewide association-with high-throughput genomics, it is now possible to define quantitative trait loci (QTLs), single-gene variants, and even single SNPs and indels that control gene expression in different brain regions and cells. This review considers some of the major technical and conceptual challenges in analyzing variation in expression in the CNS with a focus on mRNAs, rather than noncoding RNAs or proteins. At one level of analysis, this work has been highly successful, and we finally have techniques that can be used to track down small numbers of loci that control expression in the CNS. But at a higher level of analysis, we still do not understand the genetic architecture of gene expression in brain, the consequences of expression QTLs on protein levels or on cell function, or the combined impact of expression differences on behavior and disease risk. These important gaps are likely to be bridged over the next several decades using (1) much larger sample sizes, (2) more powerful RNA sequencing and proteomic methods, and (3) novel statistical and computational models to predict genome-to-phenome relations.

Citing Articles

The most common European HINT1 neuropathy variant phenotype and its case studies.

Rozevska M, Rots D, Gailite L, Linde R, Mironovs S, Timcenko M Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1084335.

PMID: 36873433 PMC: 9981799. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1084335.


Natural Mutations Affect Structure and Function of gC1q Domain of Otolin-1.

Holubowicz R, Ozyhar A, Dobryszycki P Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(16).

PMID: 34445792 PMC: 8396674. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169085.


RNA sequencing profiling of the retina in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice: Enhancing the retinal microarray data sets from GeneNetwork.

Wang J, Geisert E, Struebing F Mol Vis. 2019; 25:345-358.

PMID: 31354228 PMC: 6612415.


Evaluation of Sirtuin-3 probe quality and co-expressed genes using literature cohesion.

Roy S, Zaman K, Williams R, Homayouni R BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(Suppl 2):104.

PMID: 30871457 PMC: 6419539. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2621-z.


C57BL/6 substrain differences in inflammatory and neuropathic nociception and genetic mapping of a major quantitative trait locus underlying acute thermal nociception.

Bryant C, Bagdas D, Goldberg L, Khalefa T, Reed E, Kirkpatrick S Mol Pain. 2019; 15:1744806918825046.

PMID: 30632432 PMC: 6365993. DOI: 10.1177/1744806918825046.


References
1.
Heinzen E, Ge D, Cronin K, Maia J, Shianna K, Gabriel W . Tissue-specific genetic control of splicing: implications for the study of complex traits. PLoS Biol. 2009; 6(12):e1. PMC: 2605930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000001. View

2.
Eisenberg E, Levanon E . Human housekeeping genes, revisited. Trends Genet. 2013; 29(10):569-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.010. View

3.
Haley C, Knott S . A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb). 1992; 69(4):315-24. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. View

4.
Parsons M, Grimm C, Paya-Cano J, Fernandes C, Liu L, Philip V . Genetic variation in hippocampal microRNA expression differences in C57BL/6 J X DBA/2 J (BXD) recombinant inbred mouse strains. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:476. PMC: 3496628. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-476. View

5.
Pickrell J, Marioni J, Pai A, Degner J, Engelhardt B, Nkadori E . Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature. 2010; 464(7289):768-72. PMC: 3089435. DOI: 10.1038/nature08872. View