Addressing Electronic Clinical Information in the Construction of Quality Measures
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Electronic health records (EHR) and registries play a central role in health care and provide access to detailed clinical information at the individual, institutional, and population level. Use of these data for clinical quality/performance improvement and cost management has been a focus of policy initiatives over the past decade. The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA)-mandated Pediatric Quality Measurement Program supports development and testing of quality measures for children on the basis of electronic clinical information, including de novo measures and respecification of existing measures designed for other data sources. Drawing on the experience of Centers of Excellence, we review both structural and pragmatic considerations in e-measurement. The presence of primary observations in EHR-derived data make it possible to measure outcomes in ways that are difficult with administrative data alone. However, relevant information may be located in narrative text, making it difficult to interpret. EHR systems are collecting more discrete data, but the structure, semantics, and adoption of data elements vary across vendors and sites. EHR systems also differ in ability to incorporate pediatric concepts such as variable dosing and growth percentiles. This variability complicates quality measurement, as do limitations in established measure formats, such as the Quality Data Model, to e-measurement. Addressing these challenges will require investment by vendors, researchers, and clinicians alike in developing better pediatric content for standard terminologies and data models, encouraging wider adoption of technical standards that support reliable quality measurement, better harmonizing data collection with clinical work flow in EHRs, and better understanding the behavior and potential of e-measures.
Impact of Implementing Electronic Nursing Records on Quality and Safety Indicators in Care.
Douma M, Rejeb M, Zardoub N, Braham A, Chouchene H, Bouallegue O Libyan J Med. 2024; 19(1):2421625.
PMID: 39570988 PMC: 11583327. DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2421625.
Addison J, Razzaghi H, Bailey C, Dickinson K, Corathers S, Hartley D Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024; 7(5):e602.
PMID: 38584961 PMC: 10997286. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000602.
Testing the Use of Data Drawn from the Electronic Health Record to Compare Quality.
Walsh K, Razzaghi H, Hartley D, Utidjian L, Alford S, Darwar R Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021; 6(4):e432.
PMID: 34345748 PMC: 8322494. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000432.
Utilizing the Axon Registry® for quality improvement.
Patel A, Fritz J, Evans D, Lundgren K, Hentges K, Jones Jr L Neurol Clin Pract. 2018; 8(5):456-461.
PMID: 30564501 PMC: 6276356. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000516.
Using a stakeholder-engaged approach to develop and validate electronic clinical quality measures.
Herndon J, Aravamudhan K, Stephenson R, Brandon R, Ruff J, Catalanotto F J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(3):503-512.
PMID: 28339559 PMC: 7651948. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw137.