Configural Gestalts Remain Nothing More Than the Sum of Their Parts in Visual Agnosia

Overview

Journal Iperception

Date 2014 Aug 29

PMID 25165506

Citations 4

Authors

Lee H de-Wit

Jonas Kubilius

Hans P Op de Beeck

Johan Wagemans

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We report converging evidence that higher stages of the visual system are critically required for the whole to become more than the sum of its parts by studying patient DF with visual agnosia using a configural superiority paradigm. We demonstrate a clear dissociation between this patient and normal controls such that she could more easily report information about parts, demonstrating a striking reversal of the normal configural superiority effect. Furthermore, by comparing DF's performance to earlier neuroimaging and novel modeling work, we found a compelling consistency between her performance and representations in the early visual areas, which are spared in this patient. The reversed pattern of performance in this patient highlights that in some cases visual Gestalts do not emerge early on without processing in higher visual areas. More broadly, this study demonstrates how neuropsychological patients can be used to unmask representations maintained at early stages of processing.

Citing Articles

Skeletal representations of shape in the human visual cortex.

Ayzenberg V, Kamps F, Dilks D, Lourenco S Neuropsychologia. 2021; 164:108092.

PMID: 34801519 PMC: 9840386. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108092.

Gestalts at threshold could reveal Gestalts as predictions.

Costa T, Wagemans J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18308.

PMID: 34526565 PMC: 8443602. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97878-0.

Neural Signatures of the Configural Superiority Effect and Fundamental Emergent Features in Human Vision.

Costa T, Orsten-Hooge K, Rego G, Wagemans J, R Pomerantz J, Boggio P Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):13954.

PMID: 30224676 PMC: 6141526. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32289-2.

Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.

Ozana A, Ganel T Psychol Res. 2017; 83(5):977-988.

PMID: 28871420 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0913-3.

References

Goodale M, Milner A, Jakobson L, Carey D . A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature. 1991; 349(6305):154-6. DOI: 10.1038/349154a0. View

Peirce J . Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform. 2009; 2:10. PMC: 2636899. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008. View

Mannan S, Kennard C, Husain M . The role of visual salience in directing eye movements in visual object agnosia. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(6):R247-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.020. View

Crawford J, Garthwaite P, Porter S . Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 27(3):245-60. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2010.513967. View

Wannig A, Stanisor L, Roelfsema P . Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along Gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(10):1243-4. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2910. View

Peirce J . PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 162(1-2):8-13. PMC: 2018741. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017. View

DiCarlo J, Cox D . Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(8):333-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.010. View

Riesenhuber M, Poggio T . Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(11):1019-25. DOI: 10.1038/14819. View

Xu X, Yue X, Lescroart M, Biederman I, Kim J . Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): image or person?. Vision Res. 2009; 49(23):2800-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.021. View

10.

Ossandon J, Onat S, Cazzoli D, Nyffeler T, Muri R, Konig P . Unmasking the contribution of low-level features to the guidance of attention. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(14):3478-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.043. View

11.

Kubilius J, Wagemans J, Op de Beeck H . Emergence of perceptual Gestalts in the human visual cortex: the case of the configural-superiority effect. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(10):1296-303. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417000. View

12.

James T, Culham J, Humphrey G, Milner A, Goodale M . Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 11):2463-75. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg248. View

13.

Bridge H, Thomas O, Minini L, Cavina-Pratesi C, Milner A, Parker A . Structural and functional changes across the visual cortex of a patient with visual form agnosia. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(31):12779-91. PMC: 6618540. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4853-12.2013. View

14.

Pomerantz J, Sager L, Stoever R . Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1977; 3(3):422-35. View

15.

Li Z . Contextual influences in V1 as a basis for pop out and asymmetry in visual search. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(18):10530-5. PMC: 17923. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10530. View

16.

Li Z . A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002; 6(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01817-9. View