» Articles » PMID: 25164244

Word Categorization from Distributional Information: Frames Confer More Than the Sum of Their (Bigram) Parts

Overview
Journal Cogn Psychol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2014 Aug 29
PMID 25164244
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grammatical categories, such as noun and verb, are the building blocks of syntactic structure and the components that govern the grammatical patterns of language. However, in many languages words are not explicitly marked with their category information, hence a critical part of acquiring a language is categorizing the words. Computational analyses of child-directed speech have shown that distributional information-information about how words pattern with one another in sentences-could be a useful source of initial category information. Yet questions remain as to whether learners use this kind of information, and if so, what kinds of distributional patterns facilitate categorization. In this paper we investigated how adults exposed to an artificial language use distributional information to categorize words. We compared training situations in which target words occurred in frames (i.e., surrounded by two words that frequently co-occur) against situations in which target words occurred in simpler bigram contexts (where an immediately adjacent word provides the context for categorization). We found that learners categorized words together when they occurred in similar frame contexts, but not when they occurred in similar bigram contexts. These findings are particularly relevant because they accord with computational investigations showing that frame contexts provide accurate category information cross-linguistically. We discuss these findings in the context of prior research on distribution-based categorization and the broader implications for the role of distributional categorization in language acquisition.

Citing Articles

Distributional Lattices as a Model for Discovering Syntactic Categories in Child-Directed Speech.

Zhu H, Clark A J Psycholinguist Res. 2022; 51(4):917-931.

PMID: 35348946 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09872-w.


Language Usage and Second Language Morphosyntax: Effects of Availability, Reliability, and Formulaicity.

Guo R, Ellis N Front Psychol. 2021; 12:582259.

PMID: 33995170 PMC: 8116661. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582259.


A distributional perspective on the gavagai problem in early word learning.

Aslin R, Wang A Cognition. 2021; 213:104680.

PMID: 33853740 PMC: 8324554. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104680.


Lexical category acquisition is facilitated by uncertainty in distributional co-occurrences.

Cassani G, Grimm R, Daelemans W, Gillis S PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0209449.

PMID: 30592738 PMC: 6310260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209449.


Distributional learning of subcategories in an artificial grammar: Category generalization and subcategory restrictions.

Reeder P, Newport E, Aslin R J Mem Lang. 2018; 97:17-29.

PMID: 29456288 PMC: 5810951. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.006.

References
1.
Mintz T . Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition. 2003; 90(1):91-117. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00140-9. View

2.
Shi R, Morgan J, Allopenna P . Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: a cross-linguistic perspective. J Child Lang. 1998; 25(1):169-201. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000997003395. View

3.
Arnon I, Ramscar M . Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: how order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition. 2011; 122(3):292-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.009. View

4.
Pacton S, Perruchet P . An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(1):80-96. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.80. View

5.
Theakston A, Lieven E, Pine J, Rowland C . The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. J Child Lang. 2001; 28(1):127-52. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900004608. View