» Articles » PMID: 25159658

Dual-port Distal Gastrectomy for the Early Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Aug 28
PMID 25159658
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN), are now available and are crucial for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) or reduced port surgery (RPS). We carried out reduced port distal gastrectomy (RPDG) using a dual-port method with a SILS port.

Methods: Ten patients who were diagnosed as early stage gastric cancer were offered the RPDG. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.1 and 21.4, respectively. No distant metastasis or regional lymph node swelling was seen in any case. A 5-mm flexible scope (Olympus, JAPAN) and SILS port were used and a nylon ligature with a straight needle, instead of a surgical instrument, was available to raise the gastric wall.

Results: The average operative time was 266.9 ± 38.3 min and blood loss was 37.8 ± 56.8 ml. Patients recovered well and experienced no complications after surgery. All patients could tolerate soft meals on the first day after surgery and the average hospital stay was 8.1 days. Past conventional LAG cases were evaluated to compare the short-term outcome and no difference was seen in the mean operative time or operative blood loss. The length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter for the RPDG group than the conventional operation group (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the trend of serum CRP elevation after surgery was lower in the RPDG group than the conventional LAG group (p = 0.053).

Conclusions: Although the benefits of RPS have not been established, this type of surgery may be expected to have some advantages. Cosmetic benefits and shorter hospital stays are clear advantages. Less invasiveness can be expected according to the trend of serum CRP elevation after RPDG.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and preliminary experience of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Overlap esophagojejunostomy for gastric cancer: A study of 10 cases.

Yin J, Chen Y, Ren Y, Wang R, Su S, Jiang E Front Surg. 2023; 9:1071363.

PMID: 36700036 PMC: 9869672. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1071363.


Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and post-operative recovery between single-incision and multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Lin L, Xu Q, Xu F, Zhou C, Huang X, Chen R J Minim Access Surg. 2022; 18(4):578-584.

PMID: 35899917 PMC: 9632719. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_219_21.


Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Teng W, Liu J, Liu W, Jiang J, Chen M, Wei C Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 11(2):358-366.

PMID: 35281417 PMC: 8904954. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-1916.


Current Status and Trends of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Korea.

Park S, Kim J, Park S Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(11).

PMID: 34833413 PMC: 8621245. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111195.


Comparing the surgical outcomes of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and three-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Ahn H, Chang M, Han D Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021; 100(1):18-24.

PMID: 33457393 PMC: 7791190. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.18.


References
1.
Hirano Y, Hattori M, Douden K, Shimizu S, Sato Y, Maeda K . Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery. Scand J Surg. 2012; 101(4):283-6. DOI: 10.1177/145749691210100411. View

2.
Tanabe S, Ishido K, Higuchi K, Sasaki T, Katada C, Azuma M . Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center. Gastric Cancer. 2013; 17(1):130-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-013-0241-2. View

3.
Coratti A, Annecchiarico M, Marino M, Gentile E, Coratti F, Giulianotti P . Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations. World J Surg. 2013; 37(12):2771-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2100-z. View

4.
Habersberger J, Eisenhardt S, Peter K . C-reactive protein measurement and cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2010; 375(9720):1078. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60470-9. View

5.
Saber A, El-Ghazaly T . Early experience with SILS port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009; 19(6):428-30. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181c48993. View