» Articles » PMID: 25159462

Application of Computer-aided Designed/computer-aided Manufactured Techniques in Reconstructing Maxillofacial Bony Structures

Overview
Date 2014 Aug 28
PMID 25159462
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Today, virtually planned surgery and computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) tools to reconstruct bony structures are being increasingly applied to maxillofacial surgery. However, the criteria for or against the usage of the CAD/CAM technique are disputable, since no evidence-based studies are available. Theoretically, the CAD/CAM technique should be applied to complex cases. In this case report, we present our experiences and discuss the criteria for application.

Case Report: Three cases are reported in which subjects received an osseous reconstruction using CAD/CAM techniques. In the first case, resection of the mandibular body and ramus was carried out, and reconstruction with a vascularised iliac bone transplant was performed. During surgery, a repositioning of the ipsilateral condyle was necessary. The second case comprised a wide mandibular reconstruction together with a repositioning of the condyles and the soft tissue chin using a two-segment osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. In the third case, a two-flap technique consisting of a double-barrelled osseous fibula flap and a radial forearm flap was applied to cover a wide palatine defect.

Conclusion: Our experience suggests that the CAD/CAM technique provides an accurate and useful treatment not only in complex cases, but also in simpler ones, to achieve an anatomically correct shape of the bone transplant and to reposition adjacent structures.

Citing Articles

Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients.

Knitschke M, Sonnabend S, Roller F, Pons-Kuhnemann J, Schmermund D, Attia S Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(5):3375-3392.

PMID: 35621664 PMC: 9139377. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050274.


Impact of Planning Method (Conventional versus Virtual) on Time to Therapy Initiation and Resection Margins: A Retrospective Analysis of 104 Immediate Jaw Reconstructions.

Knitschke M, Backer C, Schmermund D, Bottger S, Streckbein P, Howaldt H Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34208555 PMC: 8235255. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123013.


Effects of Steam Sterilization on 3D Printed Biocompatible Resin Materials for Surgical Guides-An Accuracy Assessment Study.

Sharma N, Cao S, Msallem B, Kunz C, Brantner P, Honigmann P J Clin Med. 2020; 9(5).

PMID: 32429549 PMC: 7291001. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051506.


Advantages of surgical simulation in the surgical reconstruction of oncological patients.

Iglesias-Martin F, Oliveros-Lopez L, Fernandez-Olavarria A, Serrera-Figallo M, Gutierrez-Corrales A, Torres-Lagares D Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; 23(5):e596-e601.

PMID: 30148473 PMC: 6167105. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22336.


Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.

Luongo F, Mangano F, Macchi A, Luongo G, Mangano C Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2016:5862586.

PMID: 28070512 PMC: 5192311. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5862586.


References
1.
Okay D, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M . Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(4):352-63. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.119524. View

2.
Seruya M, Fisher M, Rodriguez E . Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(5):1219-1228. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3c0b1. View

3.
Tepper O, Sorice S, Hershman G, Saadeh P, Levine J, Hirsch D . Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(3):733-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.028. View

4.
Hanasono M, Skoracki R . Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2012; 123(3):597-604. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23717. View

5.
Boyd J, Gullane P, Rotstein L, Brown D, Irish J . Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(7):1266-75. View