» Articles » PMID: 25157911

Genetic Risk Scores Associated with Baseline Lipoprotein Subfraction Concentrations Do Not Associate with Their Responses to Fenofibrate

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Aug 27
PMID 25157911
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lipoprotein subclass concentrations are modifiable markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Fenofibrate is known to show beneficial effects on lipoprotein subclasses, but little is known about the role of genetics in mediating the responses of lipoprotein subclasses to fenofibrate. A recent genomewide association study (GWAS) associated several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with lipoprotein measures, and validated these associations in two independent populations. We used this information to construct genetic risk scores (GRSs) for fasting lipoprotein measures at baseline (pre-fenofibrate), and aimed to examine whether these GRSs also associated with the responses of lipoproteins to fenofibrate. Fourteen lipoprotein subclass measures were assayed in 817 men and women before and after a three week fenofibrate trial. We set significance at a Bonferroni corrected alpha <0.05 (p < 0.004). Twelve subclass measures changed with fenofibrate administration (each p = 0.003 to <0.0001). Mixed linear models which controlled for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, pedigree and study-center, revealed that GRSs were associated with eight baseline lipoprotein measures (p < 0.004), however no GRS was associated with fenofibrate response. These results suggest that the mechanisms for changes in lipoprotein subclass concentrations with fenofibrate treatment are not mediated by the genetic risk for fasting levels.

Citing Articles

Genetic associations with lipoprotein subfraction measures differ by ethnicity in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Wang Z, Manichukal A, Goff Jr D, Mora S, Ordovas J, Pajewski N Hum Genet. 2017; 136(6):715-726.

PMID: 28352986 PMC: 5429342. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-017-1782-y.

References
1.
Aslibekyan S, Goodarzi M, Frazier-Wood A, Yan X, Irvin M, Kim E . Variants identified in a GWAS meta-analysis for blood lipids are associated with the lipid response to fenofibrate. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e48663. PMC: 3485381. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048663. View

2.
Gray R, Robbins D, Wang W, Yeh J, Fabsitz R, Cowan L . Relation of LDL size to the insulin resistance syndrome and coronary heart disease in American Indians. The Strong Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17(11):2713-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.17.11.2713. View

3.
Hiukka A, Leinonen E, Jauhiainen M, Sundvall J, Ehnholm C, Keech A . Long-term effects of fenofibrate on VLDL and HDL subspecies in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2007; 50(10):2067-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0751-8. View

4.
Tsai M, Ordovas J, Li N, Straka R, Hanson N, Arends V . Effect of fenofibrate therapy and ABCA1 polymorphisms on high-density lipoprotein subclasses in the Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network. Mol Genet Metab. 2010; 100(2):118-22. PMC: 3598593. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.03.001. View

5.
Mykkanen L, Haffner S, Rainwater D, Karhapaa P, Miettinen H, Laakso M . Relationship of LDL size to insulin sensitivity in normoglycemic men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17(7):1447-53. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.17.7.1447. View