» Articles » PMID: 25147516

The Neural Correlates of the Decoy Effect in Decisions

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2014 Aug 23
PMID 25147516
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human choices are remarkably susceptible to the context in which options are presented. The introduction of an inferior option (a decoy) into the choice set can make one of the original options (the target) more attractive than and the other original option (the competitor). This so called "decoy effect" represents a striking violation of the "context-invariant" axiom, yet its underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we used a novel gambling task in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate its neural basis. At both the stimulus and decision phases, choice sets with decoys activated the occipital gyrus and deactivated the inferior parietal gyrus. At the decision phase, choosing the targets vs. the competitors elicited stronger anterior insula activation, suggesting that perceptual salience drives heuristic decision making in the decoy effect. Moreover, across participants, activity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) predicted a reduced susceptibility to the decoy effect, indicating that resisting the tendency to make heuristic decisions is taxing. Our findings highlight the power of the decoy effect in laboratory settings and document the neural mechanisms underlying the decoy effect.

Citing Articles

Can professionals "keep the tiller straight" in organizations? Resistance to reframing and decoy alternatives in workplace decision-making.

Angioletti L, Acconito C, Crivelli D, Balconi M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1270012.

PMID: 38481625 PMC: 10933049. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1270012.


Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects.

Di Crosta A, Marin A, Palumbo R, Ceccato I, La Malva P, Gatti M Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37754033 PMC: 10525293. DOI: 10.3390/bs13090755.


Identifying identity and attributing value to attributes: reconsidering mechanisms of preference decisions.

Perkins A, Rich E Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022; 41:98-105.

PMID: 36341022 PMC: 9635260. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.019.


Context-effect bias in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.): exploring decoy influences in a value-based food choice task.

Marini M, Boschetti C, Gastaldi S, Addessi E, Paglieri F Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(2):503-514.

PMID: 36125642 PMC: 9950244. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01670-0.


The Consumer Contextual Decision-Making Model.

Suomala J Front Psychol. 2020; 11:570430.

PMID: 33117237 PMC: 7559398. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570430.


References
1.
Trueblood J, Brown S, Heathcote A, Busemeyer J . Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(6):901-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464241. View

2.
Santos A, Mier D, Kirsch P, Meyer-Lindenberg A . Evidence for a general face salience signal in human amygdala. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(4):3111-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.024. View

3.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View

4.
Evans J . In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(10):454-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. View

5.
Botvinick M, Cohen J, Carter C . Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(12):539-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003. View