» Articles » PMID: 25146722

Prevalence of Low Back Pain by Anatomic Location and Intensity in an Occupational Population

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2014 Aug 23
PMID 25146722
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem, with variation in prevalence. Epidemiological reports of rating of pain intensity and location within the low back area are rare. The objective is to describe LBP in a large, multi-center, occupational cohort detailing both point and 1-month period prevalence of LBP by location and intensity measures at baseline.

Methods: In this cross-sectional report from a prospective cohort study, 828 participants were workers enrolled from 30 facilities performing a variety of manual material handling tasks. All participants underwent a structured interview detailing pain rating and location. Symptoms in the lower extremities, demographic and other data were collected. Body mass indices were measured. Outcomes are pain rating (0-10) in five defined lumbar back areas (i) LBP in the past month and (ii) LBP on the day of enrollment. Pain ratings were reported on a 0-10 scale and subsequently collapsed with ratings of 1-3, 4-6 and 7-10 classified as low, medium and high respectively.

Results: 172 (20.8%) and 364 (44.0%) of the 828 participants reported pain on the day of enrollment or within the past month, respectively. The most common area of LBP was in the immediate paraspinal area with 130 (75.6%) participants with point prevalence LBP and 278 (77.4%) with 1-month period prevalence reported having LBP in the immediate paraspinal area. Among those 364 reporting 1-month period prevalence pain, ratings varied widely with 116 (31.9%) reporting ratings classified as low, 170 (46.7%) medium and 78 (21.4%) providing high pain ratings in any location. Among the 278 reporting 1-month period prevalence pain in the immediate paraspinal area, 89 (32.0%) reported ratings classified as low, 129 (46.4%), medium and 60 (21.6%) high pain ratings.

Conclusions: Pain ratings varied widely, however less variability was seen in pain location, with immediate paraspinal region being the most common. Variations may suggest different etiological factors related to LBP. Aggregation of different locations of pain or different intensities of pain into one binary classification of LBP may result in loss of information which may potentially be useful in prevention or treatment of LBP.

Citing Articles

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory Among Chinese Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Tang R, Wan D, Leng C, Fan X, Li Y, Ma J J Pain Res. 2024; 17:4263-4276.

PMID: 39698256 PMC: 11654211. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S499700.


Serum Endothelin-1 Level Can Reflect the Degree of Lumbar Degeneration: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Uslu E, Gulkesen A, Akgol G, Alkan G, Poyraz A, Ilhan N Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59966.

PMID: 38854285 PMC: 11162144. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59966.


Exosomes for the Management of Low Back Pain: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

Gupta A Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e57539.

PMID: 38707134 PMC: 11068073. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57539.


Effects of Manual Therapy Plus Pain Neuroscience Education with Integrated Motivational Interviewing in Individuals with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Kasimis K, Apostolou T, Kallistratos I, Lytras D, Iakovidis P Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(4).

PMID: 38674202 PMC: 11052486. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040556.


Effectiveness of prevention exercises protocol among office workers with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Lach P, Cyganska A Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024; 37(1):45-57.

PMID: 38362945 PMC: 10959280. DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02164.


References
1.
Goetzel R, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski R, Wang S . The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2003; 45(1):5-14. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200301000-00007. View

2.
Krause N, Ragland D . Occupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(9):1011-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199405000-00002. View

3.
Holtermann A, Hansen J, Burr H, Sogaard K . Prognostic factors for long-term sickness absence among employees with neck-shoulder and low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009; 36(1):34-41. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2883. View

4.
Jones K, Vojir C, Hutt E, Fink R . Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44(2):305-14. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.05.0051. View

5.
Koes B, van Tulder M, Lin C, Macedo L, McAuley J, Maher C . An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(12):2075-94. PMC: 2997201. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y. View