» Articles » PMID: 25143559

The Impact of Surface Preparation on Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement

Overview
Journal J Orthod
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Aug 22
PMID 25143559
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of four enamel preparation techniques on shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) and enamel surface roughness (Ra) were also investigated after cement removal.

Materials And Methods: One hundred and forty-four human premolars were divided into four groups (n = 36 in each group) as follows: Group 1, 37% phosphoric acid (i.e. conventional); Group 2, sandblasting; Group 3, sodium hypochlorite and 37% phosphoric acid; and Group 4, sodium hypochlorite and sandblasting. Twenty-four hours after bonding, the brackets were debonded with an Instron machine using a crosshead speed of 1·0 mm/min; the ARI was evaluated by an image analyser system; the Ra was measured by profilometry; and the morphology of the tooth enamel surface was observed by scanning electron microscope evaluation. Data were submitted to ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0·05).

Results: Mean SBS values for Groups 1-4 were 13·86, 9·08, 17 and 9·63 MPa, respectively. Mean ARI for Groups 1-4 were 11·16, 2·06, 20·66 and 3·73%. The SBS and ARI showed statistically significant differences between the four groups (P<0·001). The Ra (μm) showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions: Bracket bonding using RMGIC showed adequate adhesion for clinical use, and the type of enamel preparation had a significant influence.

Citing Articles

Influence of Surface Treatment and Protracted Ageing on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Two Digitally Fabricated (Milled and 3D-Printed) Polymethacrylate-Based Provisional Crowns.

Hassan N, Mattoo K, Khawaji A, Najmi H, Sadeli A, Alshahrani A Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076191 PMC: 11902808. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050699.


Effectiveness of Two Intensity Levels of Diode Laser in Debonding Metallic Brackets Regarding Enamel Surface Integrity and Pulpal Temperature: An Ex-Vivo Study.

Mousa M, Al-Jannan H, Sultan K, Ajaj M, Hajeer M, Al-Manadili A Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41372.

PMID: 37408936 PMC: 10319451. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41372.


Effects of Acidic Environments on Dental Structures after Bracket Debonding.

Iosif C, Cuc S, Prodan D, Moldovan M, Petean I, Badea M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24).

PMID: 36555225 PMC: 9778796. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415583.


In vitro surface analysis of the brushing resistance of orthodontic sealants using two different profilometric evaluation methods.

Lorenz J, Schidtmann I, Morawietz M, Kiesow A, Wehrbein H, Sarembe S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16133.

PMID: 36167702 PMC: 9515092. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19702-7.


Effect of enamel-surface modifications on shear bond strength using different adhesive materials.

Zheng B, Cao S, Al-Somairi M, He J, Liu Y BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):224.

PMID: 35672818 PMC: 9175421. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02254-7.