» Articles » PMID: 25133918

Criminogenic Factors, Psychotic Symptoms, and Incident Arrests Among People with Serious Mental Illnesses Under Intensive Outpatient Treatment

Overview
Journal Law Hum Behav
Date 2014 Aug 19
PMID 25133918
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although research robustly indicates that general or "criminogenic" factors predict various measures of recidivism, there is controversy about the extent to which these factors, versus untreated symptoms, lead to justice involvement for people with mental illnesses. Based on a sample of 183 people in intensive outpatient treatment followed for an average period of 34.5 months, the present study tested whether criminogenic factors (i.e., factor-analytically derived proxies of some of the "Central Eight"; Andrews & Bonta, 2010) and psychotic symptoms were independently associated with arrest. The study also compared the predictive utility of these domains. In the fully adjusted model, the antisocial subscale and male sex were associated with increased arrest rates, whereas psychosis and age were associated with decreased arrest rates. Criminogenic factors and psychotic symptoms had comparable predictive utility. We conclude that criminogenic factors-chiefly arrest history-and psychotic symptoms predict arrest rates. Both sets of variables appear useful for assessing risk of arrest among people with mental illnesses who are not under current correctional supervision.

Citing Articles

How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review.

Vest J, Hinrichs R, Hosler H Health Justice. 2023; 11(1):48.

PMID: 37979059 PMC: 10656991. DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00246-5.


Strategies for supervising people with mental illnesses on probation caseloads: results from a nationwide study.

Van Deinse T, Cowell Mercier M, Waters A, Disbennett M, Cuddeback G, Velazquez T Health Justice. 2023; 11(1):41.

PMID: 37824043 PMC: 10570184. DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00241-w.


Community-Based Mental Health Treatment Preceding Jail Detention among Adults with Serious Mental Illness.

Swartz J, Tabahi S Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2021; 16(2):104-116.

PMID: 34234625 PMC: 8259790. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2016.1255283.


Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Future of Psychiatric Research into American Gun Violence.

Metzl J, Piemonte J, McKay T Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021; 29(1):81-89.

PMID: 33417376 PMC: 7803479. DOI: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000280.


A comparison of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptomatology between psychiatric inpatients with and without criminal justice involvement.

Bolanos A, Mitchell S, Morgan R, Grabowski K Law Hum Behav. 2020; 44(4):336-346.

PMID: 32496084 PMC: 7415671. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000391.


References
1.
BONTA J, Law M, Hanson K . The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998; 123(2):123-42. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.123. View

2.
Hernan M, VanderWeele T . Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference. Epidemiology. 2011; 22(3):368-77. PMC: 3805254. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182109296. View

3.
Kessler R, Ustun T . The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004; 13(2):93-121. PMC: 6878592. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.168. View

4.
Morgan R, Flora D, Kroner D, Mills J, Varghese F, Steffan J . Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012; 36(1):37-50. PMC: 3266968. DOI: 10.1037/h0093964. View

5.
Callahan L, Silver E . Revocation of conditional release. A comparison of individual and program characteristics across four U.S. states. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1998; 21(2):177-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2527(98)00011-9. View