Compressed Sensing Single-breath-hold CMR for Fast Quantification of LV Function, Volumes, and Mass
Overview
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare a novel compressed sensing (CS)-based single-breath-hold multislice magnetic resonance cine technique with the standard multi-breath-hold technique for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function.
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance is generally accepted as the gold standard for LV volume and function assessment. LV function is 1 of the most important cardiac parameters for diagnosis and the monitoring of treatment effects. Recently, CS techniques have emerged as a means to accelerate data acquisition.
Methods: The prototype CS cine sequence acquires 3 long-axis and 4 short-axis cine loops in 1 single breath-hold (temporal/spatial resolution: 30 ms/1.5 × 1.5 mm(2); acceleration factor 11.0) to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF(CS)) as well as LV volumes and LV mass using LV model-based 4D software. For comparison, a conventional stack of multi-breath-hold cine images was acquired (temporal/spatial resolution 40 ms/1.2 × 1.6 mm(2)). As a reference for the left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV), aortic flow was measured by phase-contrast acquisition.
Results: In 94% of the 33 participants (12 volunteers: mean age 33 ± 7 years; 21 patients: mean age 63 ± 13 years with different LV pathologies), the image quality of the CS acquisitions was excellent. LVEF(CS) and LVEF(standard) were similar (48.5 ± 15.9% vs. 49.8 ± 15.8%; p = 0.11; r = 0.96; slope 0.97; p < 0.00001). Agreement of LVSV(CS) with aortic flow was superior to that of LVSV(standard) (overestimation vs. aortic flow: 5.6 ± 6.5 ml vs. 16.2 ± 11.7 ml, respectively; p = 0.012) with less variability (r = 0.91; p < 0.00001 for the CS technique vs. r = 0.71; p < 0.01 for the standard technique). The intraobserver and interobserver agreement for all CS parameters was good (slopes 0.93 to 1.06; r = 0.90 to 0.99).
Conclusions: The results demonstrated the feasibility of applying the CS strategy to evaluate LV function and volumes with high accuracy in patients. The single-breath-hold CS strategy has the potential to replace the multi-breath-hold standard cardiac magnetic resonance technique.
Grob L, Schwerzmann Y, Kaiser D, Jung B, Schweizer T, Huettenmoser S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(3):591-602.
PMID: 39953315 PMC: 11880142. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03348-3.
Wang Z, Wang Z, An J, Yuan Y, Pang J, He Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):8785-8797.
PMID: 39698697 PMC: 11652050. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-980.
Yerly J, Roy C, Milani B, Eyre K, Raifee M, Stuber M Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(3):975-992.
PMID: 39385350 PMC: 11680726. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30323.
Koechli M, Callaghan F, Burkhardt B, Lohezic M, Zhu X, Rucker B Pediatr Radiol. 2024; 54(10):1674-1685.
PMID: 39017676 PMC: 11377620. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-05978-6.
Wu D, Ono R, Wang S, Kobayashi Y, Sughimoto K, Liu H Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):60.
PMID: 38909231 PMC: 11193305. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01257-5.