» Articles » PMID: 25128595

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Optic Nerve Hypoplasia

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Aug 17
PMID 25128595
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To establish objective lower limits of normal optic nerve (ON) size in children based on high-resolution orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Design: Case-control study of patients with ON hypoplasia vs normal controls.

Methods: A neuroradiologist made 4 measurements of each ON at 2 locations (5 mm posterior to the optic disc and just posterior to the optic canal) in patients with ON hypoplasia and controls aged 0-17 years from an academic eye center and children's hospital. Primary analyses were performed using mixed linear models.

Results: Measurements were made in 26 cases of clinically confirmed ON hypoplasia and 31 controls (median age: ON hypoplasia, 1 year; controls, 5.5 years). Nine of 26 cases (35%) and 19 of 31 controls (61%) underwent high-resolution T2-weighted imaging of the orbits. Mean ON diameter was 1.36 mm (95% CI: 1.19-1.54; P < .001) smaller for clinically hypoplastic ONs than for controls. Optic nerve diameter increased by 0.05 mm per year of age (95% CI: 0.03-0.07; P < .001). A lower bound to the 95% prediction interval for normal optic nerves was (2.24 mm + 0.052 × [age in years]) mm and excluded all but 1 case.

Conclusions: Age was independently associated with normal ON size by MRI and should be taken into consideration when evaluating ON hypoplasia, based on MRI criteria. We have provided a formula to assist clinicians in objectively determining if ON hypoplasia is present.

Citing Articles

Correlation of optic nerve on magnetic resonance imaging with visual acuity in children with cerebral visual impairment.

Samvedya V, Smitha K, Mahesh K, Virupaxi H Oman J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(3):371-375.

PMID: 39651507 PMC: 11620311. DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_238_23.


Pituitary deficiencies related to optic nerve hypoplasia and visual acuity.

Murray A, Schwartz T, Hornung L, Lawson S Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024; 101(5):507-515.

PMID: 39099207 PMC: 11486550. DOI: 10.1111/cen.15125.


Automatic segmentation and quantification of the optic nerve on MRI using a 3D U-Net.

van Elst S, de Bloeme C, Noteboom S, de Jong M, Moll A, Goricke S J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023; 10(3):034501.

PMID: 37197374 PMC: 10185127. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.3.034501.


Normative magnetic resonance imaging measurements of orbital structures in pediatric population of North-Eastern India: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Boruah D, Dutta H, Sarma K, Hazarika K, Sharma B, Goswami A Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(8):2099-2105.

PMID: 34304186 PMC: 8482914. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_546_21.


Spotlight on the pediatric eye: a pictorial review of orbital anatomy and congenital orbital pathologies.

Bhat R, Al-Samarraie M, Nada A, Leiva-Salinas C, Whitehead M, Mahdi E Neuroradiol J. 2020; 34(1):21-32.

PMID: 32865127 PMC: 7868591. DOI: 10.1177/1971400920949232.


References
1.
Pang Y, Frantz K . Value of the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph in optic nerve hypoplasia. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(7):508-11. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31817c92df. View

2.
Bengtsson B, KRAKAU C . Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992; 230(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00166758. View

3.
Mashima Y, Oshitari K, Imamura Y, Momoshima S, Shiga H, Oguchi Y . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the intraorbital optic nerve and subarachnoid space in patients with papilledema and optic atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114(10):1197-203. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140397006. View

4.
Tian S, Nishida Y, Isberg B, Lennerstrand G . MRI measurements of normal extraocular muscles and other orbital structures. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238(5):393-404. DOI: 10.1007/s004170050370. View

5.
Beatty S, Good P, McLaughlin J, ONeill E . Echographic measurements of the retrobulbar optic nerve in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998; 82(1):43-7. PMC: 1722347. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.1.43. View