» Articles » PMID: 25125842

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel Surface with Laser Etching Versus Acid Etching: An in Vitro Evaluation

Overview
Journal J Conserv Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Aug 16
PMID 25125842
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study is in vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel which is pretreated using acid etchant and Er,Cr:Ysgg.

Materials And Methods: 40 extracted human teeth were divided in two groups of 20 each (Groups A and B). In Group A, prepared surface of enamel was etched using 37% phosphoric acid (Scotchbond, 3M). In Group B, enamel was surface treated by a an Er, Cr: YSGG laser system (Waterlase MD, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA) operating at a wavelength of 2,780 nm and having a pulse duration of 140-200 microsecond with a repetition rate of 20 Hz and 40 Hz. Bonding agent ((Scotchbond Multipurpose, 3M) was applied over the test areas on 20 samples of Groups A and B each, and light cured. Composite resin (Ceram X duo Nanoceramic restorative, Densply) was applied onto the test areas as a 3 × 3 mm diameter bid, and light cured. The samples were tested for shear bond strength.

Results: Mean shear bond strength for acid-etched enamel (26.41 ± 0.66MPa, range 25.155 to 27.150 MPa) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than for laser-etched enamel (16.23 ± 0.71MPa, range 15.233 to 17.334 MPa).

Conclusions: For enamel surface, mean shear bond strength of bonded composite obtained after laser etching were significantly lower than those obtained after acid etching.

Citing Articles

An Survey on the Effect of Six Commercial Brands of Phosphoric Acid on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel.

Jamali Zavare F, Sheikholeslamian M, Kazemi S, Ghasemi A, Panahandeh N, Yazdizadeh M J Dent (Shiraz). 2024; 25(4):316-325.

PMID: 39713110 PMC: 11662174. DOI: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97528.2015.


Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-irradiated Dentin in Primary Teeth: An Study.

Chikkanarasaiah N, P H Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023; 15(2):199-203.

PMID: 37457206 PMC: 10338938. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2369.


Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review.

Kunrath M, Gupta S, Lorusso F, Scarano A, Noumbissi S Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(11).

PMID: 34070589 PMC: 8198172. DOI: 10.3390/ma14112825.


Evaluation of bond strength of resin cement to Er:YAG laser-etched enamel and dentin after cementation of ceramic discs.

Ismatullaev A, Tasin S, Usumez A Lasers Med Sci. 2020; 36(2):447-454.

PMID: 32696424 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03103-1.


Surface Modification Techniques for Zirconia-Based Bioceramics: A Review.

Karthigeyan S, Ravindran A, Bhat R, Nageshwarao M, Murugesan S, Angamuthu V J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019; 11(Suppl 2):S131-S134.

PMID: 31198324 PMC: 6555344. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_45_19.


References
1.
Basaran E, Ayna E, Basaran G, Beydemir K . Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 26(1):13-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0742-8. View

2.
Iaria G . Clinical, morphological, and ultrastructural aspects with the use of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers in restorative dentistry. Gen Dent. 2008; 56(7):636-9. View

3.
Preethee T, Kandaswamy D, Arathi G, Hannah R . Bactericidal effect of the 908 nm diode laser on Enterococcus faecalis in infected root canals. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15(1):46-50. PMC: 3284013. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.92606. View

4.
Secilmis A, Altintas S, Usumez A, Berk G . Evaluation of mineral content of dentin prepared by erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2007; 23(4):421-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-007-0498-y. View

5.
van As G . Erbium lasers in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48(4):1017-59, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2004.06.001. View