» Articles » PMID: 25123172

Protocol for a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial Investigating Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Abstract

Background: Sacral neuromodulation has become a well-established and widely accepted treatment for refractory non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, but its value in patients with a neurological cause is unclear. Although there is evidence indicating that sacral neuromodulation may be effective and safe for treating neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, the number of investigated patients is low and there is a lack of randomized controlled trials.

Methods And Design: This study is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial including 4 sacral neuromodulation referral centers in Switzerland. Patients with refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction are enrolled. After minimally invasive bilateral tined lead placement into the sacral foramina S3 and/or S4, patients undergo prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing for 3-6 weeks. In case of successful (defined as improvement of at least 50% in key bladder diary variables (i.e. number of voids and/or number of leakages, post void residual) compared to baseline values) prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing, the neuromodulator is implanted in the upper buttock. After a 2 months post-implantation phase when the neuromodulator is turned ON to optimize the effectiveness of neuromodulation using sub-sensory threshold stimulation, the patients are randomized in a 1:1 allocation in sacral neuromodulation ON or OFF. At the end of the 2 months double-blind sacral neuromodulation phase, the patients have a neuro-urological re-evaluation, unblinding takes place, and the neuromodulator is turned ON in all patients. The primary outcome measure is success of sacral neuromodulation, secondary outcome measures are adverse events, urodynamic parameters, questionnaires, and costs of sacral neuromodulation.

Discussion: It is of utmost importance to know whether the minimally invasive and completely reversible sacral neuromodulation would be a valuable treatment option for patients with refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. If this type of treatment is effective in the neurological population, it would revolutionize the management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Trial Registration:

Trial Registration Number: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT02165774.

Citing Articles

Neurogenic bladder pathophysiology, assessment and management after lumbar diseases.

Hao J, Jiang J, Han Q, Wang K, Sun Y, Wang H EFORT Open Rev. 2025; 10(3):156-165.

PMID: 40071973 PMC: 11896685. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0087.


Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM) in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (nLUTD): Over 20 Years' Experience and Future Directions.

van Ophoven A, Engelberg S, Lilley H, Sievert K Adv Ther. 2021; 38(4):1987-2006.

PMID: 33713279 PMC: 8004509. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01650-9.


Functional brain imaging in voiding dysfunction.

Khavari R, Boone T Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2019; 14(1):24-30.

PMID: 31681452 PMC: 6824540. DOI: 10.1007/s11884-019-00503-0.


Sacral neuromodulation for female pelvic floor disorders.

El-Azab A, Siegel S Arab J Urol. 2019; 17(1):14-22.

PMID: 31258941 PMC: 6583747. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1589930.


The Management of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis.

Tornic J, Panicker J Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018; 18(8):54.

PMID: 29956001 PMC: 6022518. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0857-z.


References
1.
Groen J, Pannek J, Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R . Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(2):324-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071. View

2.
van Kerrebroeck P, van Voskuilen A, Heesakkers J, Lycklama a Nijholt A, Siegel S, Jonas U . Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007; 178(5):2029-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.032. View

3.
. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20):2191-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. View

4.
Chartier-Kastler E, Bosch J, Perrigot M, Chancellor M, Richard F, Denys P . Long-term results of sacral nerve stimulation (S3) for the treatment of neurogenic refractory urge incontinence related to detrusor hyperreflexia. J Urol. 2000; 164(5):1476-80. View

5.
Wallace P, Lane F, Noblett K . Sacral nerve neuromodulation in patients with underlying neurologic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(1):96.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.016. View