Association of Patient-provider Communication Domains with Lung Cancer Treatment

Overview

Journal J Thorac Oncol

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Oncology
Pulmonary Medicine

Date 2014 Aug 15

PMID 25122421

Citations 13

Authors

Jenny J Lin

Jessica Lake

Melanie M Wall

Andrew R Berman

John Salazar-Schicchi

Charles Powell

Steven M Keller

Ethan A Halm

Howard Leventhal

Juan P Wisnivesky

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Patient-physician communication is critical for helping patients understand and complete the complex steps needed to diagnose stage and treat lung cancer. We assessed which domains of patient-physician communication about lung cancer and its treatment are associated with receipt of disease-directed, stage-appropriate treatment.

Methods: Patients with recently diagnosed lung cancer were recruited from four medical centers in New York City from 2008 to 2011. Participants were surveyed about discussions with physicians regarding treatment, symptoms, and needs. Multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling were used to assess which communication factors were associated with disease treatment.

Results: Of the 352 participants, 191 (54%) received disease-directed, stage-appropriate treatment. Unadjusted associations between communication items and treatment found that participants who felt that their physicians explained the risks and disadvantages of lung cancer treatment (p < 0.01), discussed their chances of cure (p = 0.02), discussed goals of treatment (p < 0.01), or who were warm and friendly (p = 0.04) were more likely to undergo treatment. Three communication domains were identified: treatment information, physician support, and patient symptoms/needs. After adjusting for known determinants of lung cancer treatment, increased treatment information was associated with higher probability of cancer-directed treatment (p = 0.003). Other communication domains (physician support or patient symptoms/needs) were not independent predictors of treatment (p > 0.05 for both comparisons).

Conclusion: These data suggest that treatment information is particularly important for increasing the probability of cancer-directed therapy among lung cancer patients. Clinicians should ensure that they clearly discuss treatment goals and options with patients while maintaining empathy, supporting patient needs, and addressing symptoms.

Citing Articles

Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology.

Wall N, Fuller R, Morcos A, De Leon M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894437 PMC: 10605341. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205070.

Colorectal cancer screening disparities in Asian Americans: the influences of patient-provider communication and social media use.

Oh K, An K, Lee M, Shin C, Steves S Cancer Causes Control. 2023; 34(9):813-827.

PMID: 37266764 PMC: 10237058. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01720-z.

Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Health Disparities in Lung Nodule Management: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Steiling K, Kathuria H, Echieh C, Ost D, Rivera M, Begnaud A Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023; 207(6):e31-e46.

PMID: 36920066 PMC: 10037482. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2216ST.

Association between Patient-Provider Communication and Self-Perceived Mental Health in US Adults with Cancer: Real-World Evidence through Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Choi B, Obeng-Kusi M, Axon D Diseases. 2022; 10(4).

PMID: 36278587 PMC: 9590007. DOI: 10.3390/diseases10040088.

Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy.

Conley C, Otto A, McDonnell G, Tercyak K Transl Behav Med. 2021; 11(11):2018-2032.

PMID: 34347872 PMC: 8634534. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab089.

References

Comstock L, Hooper E, Goodwin J, Goodwin J . Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satisfaction. J Med Educ. 1982; 57(2):105-12. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198202000-00005. View

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T . Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3. View

Baile W, Aaron J . Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005; 17(4):331-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000167738.49325.2c. View

LAPINSKA E . Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment. Soc Sci Med. 1984; 19(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90132-1. View

Voils C, Steffens D, Flint E, Bosworth H . Social support and locus of control as predictors of adherence to antidepressant medication in an elderly population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005; 13(2):157-65. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.2.157. View

Street Jr R, Gordon H, Ward M, Krupat E, Kravitz R . Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005; 43(10):960-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70. View

Haskard Zolnierek K, DiMatteo M . Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009; 47(8):826-34. PMC: 2728700. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc. View

Koedoot C, Oort F, de Haan R, Bakker P, de Graeff A, de Haes J . The content and amount of information given by medical oncologists when telling patients with advanced cancer what their treatment options are. palliative chemotherapy and watchful-waiting. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40(2):225-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.008. View

Ihde D . Chemotherapy of lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(20):1434-41. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199211123272006. View

10.

Eddy D . Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA. 1990; 263(3):441-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.263.3.441. View

11.

Epstein R . Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 60(3):272-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.003. View

12.

Schoenthaler A, Chaplin W, Allegrante J, Fernandez S, Diaz-Gloster M, Tobin J . Provider communication effects medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 75(2):185-91. PMC: 2698021. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.018. View

13.

Handy Jr J . Functional outcomes after lung cancer resection: who cares as long as you are cured?. Chest. 2009; 135(2):258-259. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-2131. View

14.

Street Jr R . Information-giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32(5):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90288-n. View

15.

Morse D, Edwardsen E, Gordon H . Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(17):1853-8. PMC: 2678758. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853. View

16.

Naylor K, Ward J, Polite B . Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27(8):1033-46. PMC: 3403155. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2044-2. View

17.

Graydon J, Galloway S, Harrison D, West P . Information needs of women during early treatment for breast cancer. J Adv Nurs. 1997; 26(1):59-64. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026059.x. View

18.

Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E . Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5(6):649-55. View

19.

ZINN W . The empathic physician. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153(3):306-12. View

20.

Gabrijel S, Grize L, Helfenstein E, Brutsche M, Grossman P, Tamm M . Receiving the diagnosis of lung cancer: patient recall of information and satisfaction with physician communication. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(2):297-302. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.0609. View