» Articles » PMID: 25119892

Characteristics of Childbearing Women, Obstetrical Interventions and Preterm Delivery: a Comparison of the US and France

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Aug 15
PMID 25119892
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preterm delivery rates have remained consistently higher in the US than France, but the reasons for this excess remain poorly understood. We examined if differences in socio-demographic risk factors or more liberal use of obstetrical interventions contributed to higher rates in the US. Data on singleton live births in 1995, 1998 and 2003 from US birth certificates and the French National Perinatal Survey were used to analyze preterm delivery rate by maternal characteristics (age, parity, marital status, education, race (US)/nationality (France), prenatal care and smoking). We distinguished between preterm deliveries with a cesarean or a labor induction and those without these interventions. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RR) for the US compared to France were estimated using log-binomial regression. Preterm delivery rates were 7.9 % in the US and 4.7 % in France (risk ratio [RR] = 1.7, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.6-1.8). The US had more teen mothers and late entry to prenatal care, but fewer women smoked, although adjustment for these and other confounders did not reduce RR (1.8, 95 % CI 1.7-1.9). Preterm delivery rates associated with labor induction or cesarean were 3.3 % in the US and 2.1 % in France (RR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.5-1.7); the corresponding rates for preterm delivery without these interventions were 4.5 and 2.5 % (RR 1.8, 95 % CI 1.7-1.9), respectively. Key socio-demographic risk factors and more obstetric intervention do not explain higher US preterm delivery rates. Avenues for future research include the impact of universal access to health services (universal health insurance?) on health care quality and the association between more generous social policies, stress and the risks of preterm delivery.

Citing Articles

The prevalence of preterm and low birth weight infants among migrant women in the Pearl River Delta region, China: a population-based birth cohort study.

Xie L, Liang Z, Wang X, Luo X BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1179.

PMID: 38671398 PMC: 11055229. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18667-8.


Gestational age and 1-year hospital admission or mortality: a nation-wide population-based study.

Iacobelli S, Combier E, Roussot A, Cottenet J, Gouyon J, Quantin C BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17(1):28.

PMID: 28100222 PMC: 5242044. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0787-y.


Cross-Country Individual Participant Analysis of 4.1 Million Singleton Births in 5 Countries with Very High Human Development Index Confirms Known Associations but Provides No Biologic Explanation for 2/3 of All Preterm Births.

Ferrero D, Larson J, Jacobsson B, Di Renzo G, Norman J, Martin Jr J PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162506.

PMID: 27622562 PMC: 5021369. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162506.


Variations in very preterm birth rates in 30 high-income countries: are valid international comparisons possible using routine data?.

Delnord M, Hindori-Mohangoo A, Smith L, Szamotulska K, Richards J, Deb-Rinker P BJOG. 2016; 124(5):785-794.

PMID: 27613083 PMC: 5346062. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14273.


Variation in preterm birth rate and the role of short cervical length across two populations: a comparative cohort study.

Kazemier B, Miller E, Grobman W, Mol B J Perinatol. 2016; 36(7):516-21.

PMID: 26914017 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.12.


References
1.
Ananth C, Vintzileos A . Medically indicated preterm birth: recognizing the importance of the problem. Clin Perinatol. 2008; 35(1):53-67, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.11.001. View

2.
Kosa J, Guendelman S, Pearl M, Graham S, Abrams B, Kharrazi M . The association between pre-pregnancy BMI and preterm delivery in a diverse southern California population of working women. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 15(6):772-81. PMC: 3131509. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0633-4. View

3.
Foix-LHelias L, Blondel B . Changes in risk factors of preterm delivery in France between 1981 and 1995. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14(4):314-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00300.x. View

4.
Norman J, Morris C, Chalmers J . The effect of changing patterns of obstetric care in Scotland (1980-2004) on rates of preterm birth and its neonatal consequences: perinatal database study. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(9):e1000153. PMC: 2740823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000153. View

5.
Joseph K, Liu S, Rouleau J, Lisonkova S, Hutcheon J, Sauve R . Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e746. PMC: 3281499. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e746. View