» Articles » PMID: 25118226

Development of the PROMIS Nicotine Dependence Item Banks

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Aug 14
PMID 25118226
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Nicotine dependence is a core construct important for understanding cigarette smoking and smoking cessation behavior. This article describes analyses conducted to develop and evaluate item banks for assessing nicotine dependence among daily and nondaily smokers.

Methods: Using data from a sample of daily (N = 4,201) and nondaily (N =1,183) smokers, we conducted a series of item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses (according to gender, age, and race/ethnicity) to arrive at a unidimensional set of nicotine dependence items for daily and nondaily smokers. We also evaluated performance of short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess dependence.

Results: A total of 32 items were included in the Nicotine Dependence item banks; 22 items are common across daily and nondaily smokers, 5 are unique to daily smokers, and 5 are unique to nondaily smokers. For both daily and nondaily smokers, the Nicotine Dependence item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.97 and 0.97, respectively), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. SFs common to daily and nondaily smokers consist of 8 and 4 items (reliability = 0.91 and 0.81, respectively). Results from simulated CATs showed that dependence can be assessed with very good precision for most respondents using fewer than 6 items adaptively selected from the item banks.

Conclusions: Nicotine dependence on cigarettes can be assessed on the basis of these item banks via one of the SFs, by using CATs, or through a tailored set of items selected for a specific research purpose.

Citing Articles

Association of tobacco purchasing behaviors with tobacco use by user groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods analysis.

Kute N, Ashley D, Spears C, Nyman A, Henderson K, Do V PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313566.

PMID: 39570899 PMC: 11581335. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313566.


Sex differences in appeal, reward, and sensory experience of E-cigarette flavors among adults who smoke cigarettes.

Davis D, Buta E, Green B, Krishnan-Sarin S Prev Med. 2024; 185:108040.

PMID: 38866212 PMC: 11323236. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108040.


Smartband-based smoking detection and real-time brief mindfulness intervention: findings from a feasibility clinical trial.

Horvath M, Pittman B, OMalley S, Grutman A, Khan N, Gueorguieva R Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2352803.

PMID: 38823419 PMC: 11146247. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2352803.


Impact of Smoking Cessation Motivations and Barriers on Quit Intentions Following a Hypothetical Flavor Ban Among African American/Black Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes: A Mixed-Methods Study.

White A, Patev A, Imran R, Goden A, Rudy A, Bajwa H Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(Supplement_2):S121-S132.

PMID: 38817032 PMC: 11140224. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad062.


Development and initial validation of a new self-report measure to assess perceived dependence on tobacco and nicotine products.

Afolalu E, Salzberger T, Abetz-Webb L, Cano S, Weitkunat R, Rose J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10098.

PMID: 38698227 PMC: 11066063. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60790-4.


References
1.
Edelen M, Tucker J, Shadel W, Stucky B, Cai L . Toward a more systematic assessment of smoking: development of a smoking module for PROMIS®. Addict Behav. 2012; 37(11):1278-84. PMC: 3405537. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.016. View

2.
Pomerleau C, Carton S, Lutzke M, Flessland K, Pomerleau O . Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addict Behav. 1994; 19(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3. View

3.
Colby S, Tiffany S, Shiffman S, Niaura R . Are adolescent smokers dependent on nicotine? A review of the evidence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 59 Suppl 1:S83-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00166-0. View

4.
Stolerman I, Jarvis M . The scientific case that nicotine is addictive. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995; 117(1):2-10; discussion 14-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF02245088. View

5.
Tiffany S, Drobes D . The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Br J Addict. 1991; 86(11):1467-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x. View