» Articles » PMID: 25115938

Religious Pro-sociality? Experimental Evidence from a Sample of 766 Spaniards

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Aug 14
PMID 25115938
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores the relationship between several personal religion-related variables and social behaviour, using three paradigmatic economic games: the dictator (DG), ultimatum (UG), and trust (TG) games. A large carefully designed sample of the urban adult population in Granada (Spain) is employed (N = 766). From participants' decisions in these games we obtain measures of altruism, bargaining behaviour and sense of fairness/equality, trust, and positive reciprocity. Three dimensions of religiosity are examined: (i) religious denomination; (ii) intensity of religiosity, measured by active participation at church services; and (iii) conversion out into a different denomination than the one raised in. The major results are: (i) individuals with "no religion" made decisions closer to rational selfish behaviour in the DG and the UG compared to those who affiliate with a "standard" religious denomination; (ii) among Catholics, intensity of religiosity is the key variable that affects social behaviour insofar as religiously-active individuals are generally more pro-social than non-active ones; and (iii) the religion raised in seems to have no effect on pro-sociality, beyond the effect of the current measures of religiosity. Importantly, behaviour in the TG is not predicted by any of the religion-related variables we analyse. While the results partially support the notion of religious pro-sociality, on the other hand, they also highlight the importance of closely examining the multidimensional nature of both religiosity and pro-social behaviour.

Citing Articles

Religious Belief Among Women in Australia: Characteristics and Role in Influencing Children's Health-Related Quality of Life and Lifestyle.

Bahrampour A, Scuffham P, Cross M, Ng S J Relig Health. 2024; 64(1):287-304.

PMID: 39002072 PMC: 11845531. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02085-6.


Sustainability of religious communities.

Jo C, Kim D, Lee J PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250718.

PMID: 33961629 PMC: 8104927. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250718.


Ritual as resource management.

Rossano M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1805):20190429.

PMID: 32594870 PMC: 7423257. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0429.


God and the Welfare State - Substitutes or Complements? An Experimental Test of the Effect of Belief in God's Control.

Beery G, Ben-Nun Bloom P PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0128858.

PMID: 26061050 PMC: 4463850. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128858.


Religion and morality.

McKay R, Whitehouse H Psychol Bull. 2014; 141(2):447-73.

PMID: 25528346 PMC: 4345965. DOI: 10.1037/a0038455.

References
1.
Benjamin D, Choi J, Fisher G . RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR. Rev Econ Stat. 2019; 98(4):617-637. PMC: 6402818. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00586. View

2.
McKay R, Efferson C, Whitehouse H, Fehr E . Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1713):1858-63. PMC: 3097833. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125. View

3.
Exadaktylos F, Espin A, Branas-Garza P . Experimental subjects are not different. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:1213. PMC: 3572448. DOI: 10.1038/srep01213. View

4.
Neuman S . Is fertility indeed related to religiosity? A note on: 'marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999', Population Studies 60(2): 205-221 by Alicia Adsera. Popul Stud (Camb). 2007; 61(2):219-24. DOI: 10.1080/00324720701300354. View

5.
Shariff A, Norenzayan A . God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(9):803-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x. View