» Articles » PMID: 25114782

Monitoring Product Safety in the Postmarketing Environment

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2014 Aug 13
PMID 25114782
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The safety profile of a medicinal product may change in the postmarketing environment. Safety issues not identified in clinical development may be seen and need to be evaluated. Methods of evaluating spontaneous adverse experience reports and identifying new safety risks include a review of individual reports, a review of a frequency distribution of a list of the adverse experiences, the development and analysis of a case series, and various ways of examining the database for signals of disproportionality, which may suggest a possible association. Regulatory agencies monitor product safety through a variety of mechanisms including signal detection of the adverse experience safety reports in databases and by requiring and monitoring risk management plans, periodic safety update reports and postauthorization safety studies. The United States Food and Drug Administration is working with public, academic and private entities to develop methods for using large electronic databases to actively monitor product safety. Important identified risks will have to be evaluated through observational studies and registries.

Citing Articles

Sequential Epidemiological Analyses of Real-World Data: A Tool for Prospective Drug Safety Surveillance from the Rofecoxib Example.

Abbasi S, Lund L, Hallas J, Pottegard A Drug Saf. 2025; .

PMID: 39869300 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01512-7.


Empowering African Expertise: Enhancing Safety Data Integration and Signal Detection for COVID-19 Vaccines Through the African Union Smart Safety Surveillance Joint Signal Management Group.

Nambasa V, Gunter H, Adeyemo M, Bhawaneedin N, Blockman M, Sabblah G Drug Saf. 2025; 48(3):233-249.

PMID: 39843797 PMC: 11829835. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01493-7.


Pharmacovigilance in Vaccines: Importance, Main Aspects, Perspectives, and Challenges-A Narrative Review.

Hodel K, Sampaio Dotto Fiuza B, Conceicao R, Aleluia A, Pitanga T, Moraes Dos Santos Fonseca L Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(6).

PMID: 38931474 PMC: 11206969. DOI: 10.3390/ph17060807.


Infections associated with clozapine: a pharmacovigilance study using VigiBase.

Chretien B, Brazo P, Da Silva A, Sassier M, Dolladille C, Lelong-Boulouard V Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1260915.

PMID: 37849735 PMC: 10577313. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1260915.


Pharmacovigilance: reporting requirements throughout a product's lifecycle.

Lucas S, Ailani J, Smith T, Abdrabboh A, Xue F, Navetta M Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022; 13:20420986221125006.

PMID: 36187302 PMC: 9520146. DOI: 10.1177/20420986221125006.


References
1.
Evans S, Waller P, Davis S . Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002; 10(6):483-6. DOI: 10.1002/pds.677. View

2.
Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards I, Olsson S, Orre R, Lansner A . A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 54(4):315-21. DOI: 10.1007/s002280050466. View

3.
Stang P, Ryan P, Racoosin J, Overhage J, Hartzema A, Reich C . Advancing the science for active surveillance: rationale and design for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(9):600-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-9-201011020-00010. View

4.
Sharrar R, LaRussa P, Galea S, Steinberg S, Sweet A, Keatley R . The postmarketing safety profile of varicella vaccine. Vaccine. 2000; 19(7-8):916-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00297-8. View

5.
DeStefano F, Verstraeten T, Chen R . Hepatitis B vaccine and risk of multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2003; 1(4):461-6. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.1.4.461. View