» Articles » PMID: 25113388

Nursing-sensitive Indicators: a Concept Analysis

Overview
Journal J Adv Nurs
Specialty Nursing
Date 2014 Aug 13
PMID 25113388
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To report a concept analysis of nursing-sensitive indicators within the applied context of the acute care setting.

Background: The concept of 'nursing sensitive indicators' is valuable to elaborate nursing care performance. The conceptual foundation, theoretical role, meaning, use and interpretation of the concept tend to differ. The elusiveness of the concept and the ambiguity of its attributes may have hindered research efforts to advance its application in practice.

Design: Concept analysis.

Data Sources: Using 'clinical indicators' or 'quality of nursing care' as subject headings and incorporating keyword combinations of 'acute care' and 'nurs*', CINAHL and MEDLINE with full text in EBSCOhost databases were searched for English language journal articles published between 2000-2012. Only primary research articles were selected.

Methods: A hybrid approach was undertaken, incorporating traditional strategies as per Walker and Avant and a conceptual matrix based on Holzemer's Outcomes Model for Health Care Research.

Results: The analysis revealed two main attributes of nursing-sensitive indicators. Structural attributes related to health service operation included: hours of nursing care per patient day, nurse staffing. Outcome attributes related to patient care included: the prevalence of pressure ulcer, falls and falls with injury, nosocomial selective infection and patient/family satisfaction with nursing care.

Conclusion: This concept analysis may be used as a basis to advance understandings of the theoretical structures that underpin both research and practical application of quality dimensions of nursing care performance.

Citing Articles

Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design.

Baillie J, Bonner A, Guillouet S, Mikut C, Punzalan S, Kaczmarek A J Ren Care. 2025; 51(1):e70008.

PMID: 39873351 PMC: 11774010. DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70008.


Quality care for children and young people with complex and integrated care needs: A discussion on nursing-sensitive indicators.

Sheehan R, Ryder M, Brenner M Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 8:100275.

PMID: 39698063 PMC: 11653161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100275.


The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion.

Gormley E, Connolly M, Ryder M Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 7:100227.

PMID: 39188551 PMC: 11345314. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100227.


Identifying Nursing-Sensitive Indicators for Hospitals: A Modified Delphi Approach.

Afaneh T, Abu-Moghli F, Mihdawi M Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59472.

PMID: 38826975 PMC: 11142459. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59472.


Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.

Feller E, Di Mario S, Filomeno L, La Torre G Invest Educ Enferm. 2024; 41(3).

PMID: 38589303 PMC: 10990594. DOI: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e03.


References
1.
Aiken L, Buchan J, Ball J, Rafferty A . Transformative impact of Magnet designation: England case study. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 17(24):3330-7. PMC: 2629393. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02640.x. View

2.
Manojlovich M . Linking the practice environment to nurses' job satisfaction through nurse-physician communication. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006; 37(4):367-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00063.x. View

3.
Doran D, Harrison M, Laschinger H, Hirdes J, Rukholm E, Sidani S . Relationship between nursing interventions and outcome achievement in acute care settings. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(1):61-70. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20110. View

4.
Brown D, Donaldson N, Burnes Bolton L, Aydin C . Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance. J Healthc Qual. 2010; 32(6):9-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00083.x. View

5.
Sorlie V, Torjuul K, Ross A, Kihlgren M . Satisfied patients are also vulnerable patients--narratives from an acute care ward. J Clin Nurs. 2006; 15(10):1240-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01352.x. View