» Articles » PMID: 25110480

Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C2-C3 Fixation for Unstable Hangman's Fracture Compared with Posterior C1-C3 Fusion

Overview
Journal Korean J Spine
Date 2014 Aug 12
PMID 25110480
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To verify the clinical outcomes of posterior C2-C3 fixation for unstable Hangman's fracture compared with posterior C1-C3 fixation.

Methods: Twenty four patients for unstable Hangman's fracture were enrolled between July 2007 and June 2010 in this study. Thirteen patients underwent posterior C2-C3 fusion and 11 patients underwent posterior C1-C3 fusion. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores during preoperative and postoperative follow up period. Plain radiographs were obtained on postoperative 1 day, 1 week, and then at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months. CT was done at postoperative 12 months in all patients for evaluation of bone fusion. The mean period of clinical follow-up was 15 months.

Results: The mean ages were 43.3 years in C2-C3 group and 50.0 years in C1-C3 group. Mean follow-up period was 17.2 months in C2-C3 group and 16.3 months in C1-C3 group. VAS scores and NDI scores in C2-C3 group were much less than those in C1-C3 group at each follow-up period. The differences of VAS score and NDI scores between C2-C3 and C1-C3 groups at each follow-up period were statistically significant (p<0.001) by paired T-test. Solid Bone fusion was confirmed in all cases at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: C2-C3 group showed better clinical and biomechanical results than C1-C3 group in terms of axial pain and disability of neck.

Citing Articles

Can radiologic parameters used to detect cervical spinal instability be used in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?.

Teuber H, Halvachizadeh S, Muthirakalayil M, Yin L, Eisenkrein H, Hildebrand F Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):97.

PMID: 36841781 PMC: 9960164. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01052-3.


Functional outcome in unstable Hangman's fracture managed with anterior approach: A prospective study.

Jain V, Thakur M, Thakur A, Sud S, Lal M, Madan A J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018; 8(4):350-353.

PMID: 29403248 PMC: 5763593. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_113_17.


A novel technique for unstable Hangman's fracture: lag screw-rod (LSR) technique.

Wang S, Wang Q, Yang H, Kang J, Wang G, Song Y Eur Spine J. 2016; 26(4):1284-1290.

PMID: 27246352 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4630-1.

References
1.
Coric D, Wilson J, KELLY Jr D . Treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with nonrigid immobilization: a review of 64 cases. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85(4):550-4. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0550. View

2.
Wilson J . Treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with nonrigid immobilization: erratum. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85(6):1198. View

3.
KARIMI-NEJAD A . Surgical management of cervical spine injuries. Neurosurg Rev. 1989; 12 Suppl 1:525-35. DOI: 10.1007/BF01790699. View

4.
Bristol R, Henn J, Dickman C . Pars screw fixation of a hangman's fracture: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56(1 Suppl):E204. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000144172.84111.a6. View

5.
Li X, Dai L, Lu H, Chen X . A systematic review of the management of hangman's fractures. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(3):257-69. PMC: 3489291. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0918-2. View