» Articles » PMID: 25110465

Neurobehavioral Integrity of Chimpanzee Newborns: Comparisons Across Groups and Across Species Reveal Gene-environment Interaction Effects

Overview
Date 2014 Aug 12
PMID 25110465
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aims of this article are to describe the neurobehavioral integrity of chimpanzee newborns, to investigate how early experiences affect the neurobehavioral organization of chimpanzees, and to explore species differences by comparing chimpanzee newborns to a group of typically developing human newborns. Neurobehavioral integrity related to orientation, motor performance, arousal, and state regulation of 55 chimpanzee (raised in four different settings) and 42 human newborns was measured with the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) a semi-structured 25-minute interactive assessment. Thirty-eight chimpanzees were tested every other day from birth, and analyses revealed significant developmental changes in 19 of 27 NBAS scores. The cross-group and cross-species comparisons were conducted at 2 and 30 days of age. Among the 4 chimpanzee groups, significant differences were found in 23 of 24 NBAS scores. Surprisingly, the cross-species comparisons revealed that the human group was distinct in only 1 of 25 NBAS scores (the human group had significantly less muscle tone than all the chimpanzee groups). The human group was indistinguishable from at least one of the chimpanzee groups in the remaining 24 of 25 NBAS scores. The results of this study support the conclusion that the interplay between genes and environment, rather than genes alone or environment alone, accounts for phenotypic expressions of newborn neurobehavioral integrity in hominids.

Citing Articles

The evolution of human altriciality and brain development in comparative context.

Gomez-Robles A, Nicolaou C, Smaers J, Sherwood C Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 8(1):133-146.

PMID: 38049480 PMC: 10781642. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02253-z.


Early Socioemotional Intervention Mediates Long-Term Effects of Atypical Rearing on Structural Covariation in Gray Matter in Adult Chimpanzees.

Bard K, Hopkins W Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(4):594-603.

PMID: 29381427 PMC: 5902648. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617740685.


The developmental cognitive neuroscience of action: semantics, motor resonance and social processing.

Ni Choisdealbha A, Reid V Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(6):1585-97.

PMID: 24710665 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3924-y.


Emotional engagements predict and enhance social cognition in young chimpanzees.

Bard K, Bakeman R, Boysen S, Leavens D Dev Sci. 2014; 17(5):682-96.

PMID: 24410843 PMC: 4116479. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12145.


Primate sociality to human cooperation. Why us and not them?.

Hawkes K Hum Nat. 2013; 25(1):28-48.

PMID: 24307447 DOI: 10.1007/s12110-013-9184-x.

References
1.
Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

2.
Russell C, Bard K, Adamson L . Social referencing by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1997; 111(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.185. View

3.
Bard K, Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Tomonaga M, Tanaka M, Costall A, Matsuzawa T . Group differences in the mutual gaze of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Dev Psychol. 2005; 41(4):616-24. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.616. View

4.
Poti P, Spinozzi G . Early sensorimotor development in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1994; 108(1):93-103. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.93. View

5.
Lavelli M, Fogel A . Developmental changes in mother-infant face-to-face communication: birth to 3 months. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(2):288-305. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.2.288. View