» Articles » PMID: 25103265

Accommodation in Astigmatic Children During Visual Task Performance

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Aug 9
PMID 25103265
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy and stability of accommodation in uncorrected children during visual task performance.

Methods: Subjects were second- to seventh-grade children from a highly astigmatic population. Measurements of noncycloplegic right eye spherical equivalent (Mnc) were obtained while uncorrected subjects performed three visual tasks at near (40 cm) and distance (2 m). Tasks included reading sentences with stimulus letter size near acuity threshold and an age-appropriate letter size (high task demands) and viewing a video (low task demand). Repeated measures ANOVA assessed the influence of astigmatism, task demand, and accommodative demand on accuracy (mean Mnc) and variability (mean SD of Mnc) of accommodation.

Results: For near and distance analyses, respectively, sample size was 321 and 247, mean age was 10.37 (SD 1.77) and 10.30 (SD 1.74) years, mean cycloplegic M was 0.48 (SD 1.10) and 0.79 diopters (D) (SD 1.00), and mean astigmatism was 0.99 (SD 1.15) and 0.75 D (SD 0.96). Poor accommodative accuracy was associated with high astigmatism, low task demand (video viewing), and high accommodative demand. The negative effect of accommodative demand on accuracy increased with increasing astigmatism, with the poorest accommodative accuracy observed in high astigmats (≥3.00 D) with high accommodative demand/high hyperopia (1.53 D and 2.05 D of underaccommodation for near and distant stimuli, respectively). Accommodative variability was greatest in high astigmats and was uniformly high across task condition. No/low and moderate astigmats showed higher variability for the video task than the reading tasks.

Conclusions: Accuracy of accommodation is reduced in uncorrected children with high astigmatism and high accommodative demand/high hyperopia, but improves with increased visual task demand (reading). High astigmats showed the greatest variability in accommodation.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of toric soft contact lenses for vision correction in patients with different degrees of astigmatism: a real-world study.

Zhang G, Ye L, Wang W, Guo Y, Wei J, Ren M Int J Ophthalmol. 2023; 16(11):1845-1853.

PMID: 38028513 PMC: 10626351. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.11.17.


Accuracy and stability of accommodation and vergence responses during sustained near tasks in uncorrected hyperopes.

Ntodie M, Saunders K, Little J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14389.

PMID: 37658084 PMC: 10474059. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41244-9.


Convergence Insufficiency, Accommodative Insufficiency, Visual Symptoms, and Astigmatism in Tohono O'odham Students.

Davis A, Harvey E, Twelker J, Miller J, Leonard-Green T, Campus I J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016:6963976.

PMID: 27525112 PMC: 4971328. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6963976.


Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism.

Harvey E, Miller J, Twelker J, Davis A Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93(2):118-25.

PMID: 26808282 PMC: 4727454. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000779.

References
1.
Freeman R . Asymmetries in human accomodation and visual experience. Vision Res. 1975; 15(4):483-92. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90025-5. View

2.
Harvey E, Dobson V, Miller J, Clifford-Donaldson C . Amblyopia in astigmatic children: patterns of deficits. Vision Res. 2006; 47(3):315-26. PMC: 1861829. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.008. View

3.
Harvey E, Dobson V, Miller J . Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among Native American grade school children. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83(4):206-12. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000214333.84822.71. View

4.
Choong Y, Chen A, Goh P . A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.084. View

5.
Stark L, Strang N, Atchison D . Dynamic accommodation response in the presence of astigmatism. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003; 20(12):2228-36. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.002228. View