» Articles » PMID: 25101011

Social Implications Arise in Embodied Music Cognition Research Which Can Counter Musicological "individualism"

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2014 Aug 8
PMID 25101011
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The agenda in music research that is broadly recognized as embodied music cognition has arrived hand-in-hand with a social interpretation of music, focusing on the real-world basis of its performance, and fostering an empirical approach to musician movement regarding the communicative function and potential of those movements. However, embodied cognition emerged from traditional cognitivism, which produced a body of scientific explanation of music-theoretic concepts. The analytical object of this corpus is based on the particular imagined encounter of a listener responding to an idealized "work." Although this problem of essentialism has been identified within mainstream musicology, the lingering effects may spill over into interdisciplinary, empirical research. This paper defines the situation according to its legacy of individualism, and offers an alternative sketch of musical activity as performance event, a model that highlights the social interaction processes at the heart of musical behavior. I describe some recent empirical work based on interaction-oriented approaches, arguing that this particular focus - on the social interaction process itself - creates a distinctive and promising agenda for further research into embodied music cognition.

Citing Articles

Can a human sing with an unseen artificial partner? Coordination dynamics when singing with an unseen human or artificial partner.

Nishiyama R, Nonaka T Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1463477.

PMID: 39717549 PMC: 11663750. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1463477.


The dynamics of musical participation.

Schiavio A, Maes P, van der Schyff D Music Sci. 2022; 26(3):604-626.

PMID: 36090466 PMC: 9449429. DOI: 10.1177/1029864920988319.


Processes and Experiences of Creative Cognition in Seven Western Classical Composers.

Schiavio A, Moran N, van der Schyff D, Biasutti M, Parncutt R Music Sci. 2022; 26(2):303-325.

PMID: 35558190 PMC: 9082970. DOI: 10.1177/1029864920943931.


Musicdrops@work: Impact of Shared Listening to Short Live Music Interventions on Sense of Belonging and Subjective Wellbeing at Work.

Gusewell A, Gay-Balmaz S, Imseng C Front Psychol. 2022; 13:865938.

PMID: 35496159 PMC: 9051372. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865938.


Instrumental Technique, Expressivity, and Communication. A Qualitative Study on Learning Music in Individual and Collective Settings.

Schiavio A, van der Schyff D, Biasutti M, Moran N, Parncutt R Front Psychol. 2019; 10:737.

PMID: 31001179 PMC: 6457278. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00737.


References
1.
Badino L, DAusilio A, Glowinski D, Camurri A, Fadiga L . Sensorimotor communication in professional quartets. Neuropsychologia. 2013; 55:98-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.012. View

2.
Kirschner S, Tomasello M . Joint drumming: social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2008; 102(3):299-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.005. View

3.
Phillips-Silver J, Keller P . Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musical interactions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:26. PMC: 3288575. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00026. View

4.
Lindenberger U, Li S, Gruber W, Muller V . Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10:22. PMC: 2662862. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-22. View

5.
Koelsch S, Gunter T, Wittfoth M, Sammler D . Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: an ERP Study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(10):1565-77. DOI: 10.1162/089892905774597290. View