A Qualitative Study on Barriers to Utilisation of Institutional Delivery Services in Moroto and Napak Districts, Uganda: Implications for Programming

Overview

Journal BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2014 Aug 6

PMID 25091866

Citations 38

Authors

Calistus Wilunda

Gianluca Quaglio

Giovanni Putoto

Peter Lochoro

Giovanni DallOglio

Fabio Manenti

Andrea Atzori

Rose Miligan Lochiam

Risa Takahashi

Aline Mukundwa

Koyejo Oyerinde

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Skilled attendance at delivery is critical in prevention of maternal deaths. However, many women in low- and middle-income countries still deliver without skilled assistance. This study was carried out to identify perceived barriers to utilisation of institutional delivery in two districts in Karamoja, Uganda.

Methods: Data were collected through participatory rural appraisal (PRA) with 887 participants (459 women and 428 men) in 20 villages in Moroto and Napak districts. Data were analysed using deductive content analysis. Notes taken during PRA session were edited, triangulated and coded according to recurring issues. Additionally, participants used matrix ranking to express their perceived relative significance of the barriers identified.

Results: The main barriers to utilisation of maternal health services were perceived to be: insecurity, poverty, socio-cultural factors, long distances to health facilities, lack of food at home and at health facilities, lack of supplies, drugs and basic infrastructure at health facilities, poor quality of care at health facilities, lack of participation in planning for health services and the ready availability of traditional birth attendants (TBAs). Factors related to economic and physical inaccessibility and lack of infrastructure, drugs and supplies at health facilities were highly ranked barriers to utilisation of institutional delivery.

Conclusion: A comprehensive approach to increasing the utilisation of maternal health care services in Karamoja is needed. This should tackle both demand and supply side barriers using a multi-sectorial approach since the main barriers are outside the scope of the health sector. TBAs are still active in Karamoja and their role and influence on maternal health in this region cannot be ignored. A model for collaboration between skilled health workers and TBAs in order to increase institutional deliveries is needed.

Citing Articles

Recommendations for Integrating Traditional Birth Attendants to Improve Maternal Health Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Rutledge J, Kiyanda A, Jean-Louis C, Raskin E, Gaillard J, Maxwell M Int J MCH AIDS. 2024; 13:e019.

PMID: 39526165 PMC: 11544515. DOI: 10.25259/IJMA_16_2024.

Assessment of Place of Delivery and Associated Factors among Pastoralists in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluation.

Tenaw L, Kumsa H, Arage M, Abera A, Hailu T, Mislu E J Pregnancy. 2023; 2023:2634610.

PMID: 38026544 PMC: 10653963. DOI: 10.1155/2023/2634610.

Males' perceptions and practices towards maternity care in rural southeast Nigeria: Policy implication of participatory action research for safe motherhood.

Eze I, Ossai E, Akamike I, Okedo-Alex I, Ogbonnaya L, Uneke C PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282469.

PMID: 36996090 PMC: 10062587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282469.

The impact of perception on institutional delivery service utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: the health belief model.

Nigusie A, Azale T, Yitayal M, Derseh L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):822.

PMID: 36336694 PMC: 9639283. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05140-w.

Challenges in postnatal care provision in Ethiopia.

Bala E, Roets L Front Public Health. 2022; 10:922933.

PMID: 35991036 PMC: 9387302. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922933.

References

Thaddeus S, Maine D . Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(8):1091-110. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7. View

Kerber K, de Graft-Johnson J, Bhutta Z, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn J . Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007; 370(9595):1358-69. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5. View

Ram F, Singh A . Is antenatal care effective in improving maternal health in rural uttar pradesh? Evidence from a district level household survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2006; 38(4):433-48. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932005026453. View

Freedman L, Waldman R, Pinho H, Wirth M, Chowdhury A, Rosenfield A . Transforming health systems to improve the lives of women and children. Lancet. 2005; 365(9463):997-1000. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71090-4. View

Kyomuhendo G . Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reprod Health Matters. 2003; 11(21):16-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(03)02176-1. View

Darmstadt G, Bhutta Z, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, De Bernis L . Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?. Lancet. 2005; 365(9463):977-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6. View

Waiswa P, Kemigisa M, Kiguli J, Naikoba S, Pariyo G, Peterson S . Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda - implications for programming. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8:21. PMC: 2459143. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-21. View

Hodnett E . Traditional birth attendants are an effective resource. BMJ. 2012; 344:e365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e365. View

Say L, Raine R . A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(10):812-9. PMC: 2636485. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.035659. View

10.

Ahmed S, Adams A, Chowdhury M, Bhuiya A . Changing health-seeking behaviour in Matlab, Bangladesh: do development interventions matter?. Health Policy Plan. 2003; 18(3):306-15. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czg037. View

11.

Mrisho M, Schellenberg J, Mushi A, Obrist B, Mshinda H, Tanner M . Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2007; 12(7):862-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01855.x. View

12.

Tinker A, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Azfar S, Bustreo F, Bell R . A continuum of care to save newborn lives. Lancet. 2005; 365(9462):822-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71016-3. View

13.

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

14.

Anyait A, Mukanga D, Oundo G, Nuwaha F . Predictors for health facility delivery in Busia district of Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:132. PMC: 3514288. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-132. View

15.

Gray S, Akol H, Sundal M . Longitudinal weight gain of immunized infants and toddlers in Moroto District, Uganda (Karamoja subregion). Am J Hum Biol. 2009; 22(1):111-23. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20960. View

16.

Ronsmans C, Graham W . Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1189-200. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X. View

17.

Tann C, Kizza M, Morison L, Mabey D, Muwanga M, Grosskurth H . Use of antenatal services and delivery care in Entebbe, Uganda: a community survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007; 7:23. PMC: 2098779. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-23. View

18.

Kinney M, Kerber K, Black R, Cohen B, Nkrumah F, Coovadia H . Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: where and why do they die?. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(6):e1000294. PMC: 2888581. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000294. View

19.

Campbell O, Graham W . Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006; 368(9543):1284-99. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1. View

20.

Wilson A, Gallos I, Plana N, Lissauer D, Khan K, Zamora J . Effectiveness of strategies incorporating training and support of traditional birth attendants on perinatal and maternal mortality: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011; 343:d7102. PMC: 3228291. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7102. View