» Articles » PMID: 25089071

Impressions of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) Group Cohesion: A Case for a Nonspecific Factor Predicting Later AA Attendance

Overview
Journal Alcohol Treat Q
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2014 Aug 5
PMID 25089071
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social support for abstinence in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) has been reported to be a consistent factor accounting for AA benefit. However, the nonspecific or unintended effects of such support remain poorly understood and rarely investigated. This prospective study investigated how one nonspecific factor-perceived AA group cohesiveness-predicted increased practice of AA-related behaviors. Findings indicated that impressions of AA group cohesion predicted increased AA attendance, the practice of prescribed AA activities, and self-reported AA usefulness. It appears that a sense of belongingness predicts subsequent engagement in the AA social network that, in turn, is predictive of increased abstinence.

Citing Articles

Professionals' perspectives on interventions to reduce problematic alcohol use in older adults: a realist evaluation of working elements.

van den Bulck F, Knijff R, Crutzen R, van de Mheen D, Bovens R, Stutterheim S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e077851.

PMID: 38626971 PMC: 11029254. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077851.


Group Cohesion and Climate in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Individuals with a First-Time DUI.

Cruz M, Chan Osilla K, Paddock S Alcohol Treat Q. 2020; 38(1):68-86.

PMID: 32952283 PMC: 7500184. DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2019.1613941.


The Relationship Between Perceived Alcoholics Anonymous Social Group Dynamics and Getting an AA Sponsor.

OSickey A, Hanes J, Tonigan J Alcohol Treat Q. 2020; 38(1):21-31.

PMID: 32742071 PMC: 7394485. DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2019.1613942.


More than Taking a Chair: The Perceived Group Social Dynamics of Alcoholics Anonymous Related to Changes in Spiritual Practices.

Kuerbis A, Tonigan J Alcohol Treat Q. 2018; 36(3):314-329.

PMID: 30397366 PMC: 6214356. DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2017.1420437.


Recovery resources and psychiatric severity among persons with substance use disorders.

Majer J, Payne J, Jason L Community Ment Health J. 2014; 51(4):437-44.

PMID: 25069418 PMC: 4310816. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-014-9762-3.


References
1.
Humphreys K, Huebsch P, Finney J, MOOS R . A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999; 23(3):558-63. View

2.
Montgomery H, Miller W, Tonigan J . Does Alcoholics Anonymous involvement predict treatment outcome?. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995; 12(4):241-6. DOI: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)00018-z. View

3.
Budman S, Soldz S, Demby A, FELDSTEIN M, Springer T, Davis M . Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry. 1989; 52(3):339-50. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1989.11024456. View

4.
Tonigan J, Ashcroft F, Miller W . AA group dynamics and 12-step activity. J Stud Alcohol. 1995; 56(6):616-21. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.616. View

5.
Kaskutas L, Bond J, Humphreys K . Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction. 2002; 97(7):891-900. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00118.x. View