Health Benefits, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Earlier Eligibility for Adult Antiretroviral Therapy and Expanded Treatment Coverage: a Combined Analysis of 12 Mathematical Models
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: New WHO guidelines recommend ART initiation for HIV-positive persons with CD4 cell counts ≤500 cells/µL, a higher threshold than was previously recommended. Country decision makers must consider whether to further expand ART eligibility accordingly.
Methods: We used multiple independent mathematical models in four settings-South Africa, Zambia, India, and Vietnam-to evaluate the potential health impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness of different adult ART eligibility criteria under scenarios of current and expanded treatment coverage, with results projected over 20 years. Analyses considered extending eligibility to include individuals with CD4 ≤500 cells/µL or all HIV-positive adults, compared to the previous recommendation of initiation with CD4 ≤350 cells/µL. We assessed costs from a health system perspective, and calculated the incremental cost per DALY averted ($/DALY) to compare competing strategies. Strategies were considered 'very cost-effective' if the $/DALY was less than the country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP; South Africa: $8040, Zambia: $1425, India: $1489, Vietnam: $1407) and 'cost-effective' if $/DALY was less than three times per capita GDP.
Findings: In South Africa, the cost per DALY averted of extending ART eligibility to CD4 ≤500 cells/µL ranged from $237 to $1691/DALY compared to 2010 guidelines; in Zambia, expanded eligibility ranged from improving health outcomes while reducing costs (i.e. dominating current guidelines) to $749/DALY. Results were similar in scenarios with substantially expanded treatment access and for expanding eligibility to all HIV-positive adults. Expanding treatment coverage in the general population was therefore found to be cost-effective. In India, eligibility for all HIV-positive persons ranged from $131 to $241/DALY and in Vietnam eligibility for CD4 ≤500 cells/µL cost $290/DALY. In concentrated epidemics, expanded access among key populations was also cost-effective.
Interpretation: Earlier ART eligibility is estimated to be very cost-effective in low- and middle-income settings, although these questions should be revisited as further information becomes available. Scaling-up ART should be considered among other high-priority health interventions competing for health budgets.
Funding: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and World Health Organization.
Jennings L, West R, Halim N, Kaiser J, Gwadz M, MacLeod W Trials. 2023; 24(1):310.
PMID: 37147725 PMC: 10163747. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07322-z.
Optimal allocation of HIV resources among geographical regions.
Kedziora D, Stuart R, Pearson J, Latypov A, Dierst-Davies R, Duda M BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1509.
PMID: 31718603 PMC: 6849208. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7681-5.
Guidelines for multi-model comparisons of the impact of infectious disease interventions.
den Boon S, Jit M, Brisson M, Medley G, Beutels P, White R BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):163.
PMID: 31422772 PMC: 6699075. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1403-9.
The future of a partially effective HIV vaccine: assessing limitations at the population level.
Selinger C, Dimitrov D, Welkhoff P, Bershteyn A Int J Public Health. 2019; 64(6):957-964.
PMID: 30982082 PMC: 6614161. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01234-z.
Selinger C, Bershteyn A, Dimitrov D, Adamson B, Revill P, Hallett T Vaccine. 2019; 37(16):2258-2267.
PMID: 30890385 PMC: 6684280. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.073.