» Articles » PMID: 25080930

Meiotic Abnormalities in Metaphase I Human Spermatocytes from Infertile Males: Frequencies, Chromosomes Involved, and the Relationships with Polymorphic Karyotype and Seminal Parameters

Overview
Journal Asian J Androl
Specialty Urology
Date 2014 Aug 2
PMID 25080930
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to look in depth at the relationship between meiotic anomalies and male infertility, such as the determination of the chromosomes involved or the correlation with patient features. For this purpose, a total of 31 testicular tissue samples from individuals consulting for fertility problems were analyzed. Metaphase I cells were evaluated using a sequential methodology combining Leishman stained procedures and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization protocols. The number of chromosomal units and chiasmata count per bivalent were established and a hierarchical cluster analysis of the individuals was performed. The relationship of the seminogram and the karyotype over recombination were evaluated using Poisson regression models. Results obtained in this study show a significant percentage of infertile individuals with altered meiotic behavior, mostly specified as a reduction in chiasmata count in medium and large chromosomes, the presence of univalents, and the observation of tetraploid metaphases. Moreover, the number and the type of anomalies were found to be different between cells of the same individual, suggesting the coexistence of cell lines with normal meiotic behavior and cell lines with abnormalities. In addition, chromosomal abnormalities in metaphase I are significantly associated with oligozoospermia and/or polymorphic karyotype variants.

Citing Articles

SNP Array Screening and Long Range PCR-Based Targeted Next Generation Sequencing for Autosomal Recessive Disease with Consanguinity: Insight from a Case of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group C.

Nomura F, Shimizu A, Togi S, Ura H, Niida Y Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(11).

PMID: 38003022 PMC: 10671442. DOI: 10.3390/genes14112079.


Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa caused by a novel COL7A1 variant with isodisomy.

Niida Y, Kobayashi A, Togi S, Ura H Hum Genome Var. 2023; 10(1):29.

PMID: 37985760 PMC: 10661991. DOI: 10.1038/s41439-023-00257-6.


Therapeutic Dose of Hydroxyurea-Induced Synaptic Abnormalities on the Mouse Spermatocyte.

Fan X, Zhu Y, Wang N, Zhang B, Zhang C, Wang Y Front Physiol. 2021; 12:666339.

PMID: 34305635 PMC: 8299468. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.666339.


Parental chromosomal heteromorphisms are not associated with an increased risk of embryo aneuploidy.

Hernandez-Nieto C, Gayete-Lafuente S, Alkon-Meadows T, Lee J, Luna-Rojas M, Mukherjee T JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021; 25(4):575-580.

PMID: 34061485 PMC: 8489810. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210011.


Male infertility: establishing sperm aneuploidy thresholds in the laboratory.

Garcia-Mengual E, Trivino J, Saez-Cuevas A, Bataller J, Ruiz-Jorro M, Vendrell X J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(3):371-381.

PMID: 30604135 PMC: 6439035. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1385-0.


References
1.
Hunt P, Hassold T . Sex matters in meiosis. Science. 2002; 296(5576):2181-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1071907. View

2.
Egozcue S, Blanco J, Vendrell J, Garcia F, Veiga A, Aran B . Human male infertility: chromosome anomalies, meiotic disorders, abnormal spermatozoa and recurrent abortion. Hum Reprod Update. 2000; 6(1):93-105. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/6.1.93. View

3.
Codina-Pascual M, Navarro J, Oliver-Bonet M, Kraus J, Speicher M, Arango O . Behaviour of human heterochromatic regions during the synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(6):1490-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del028. View

4.
Penna Videau S, Araujo H, Ballesta F, Ballesca J, Vanrell J . Chromosomal abnormalities and polymorphisms in infertile men. Arch Androl. 2001; 46(3):205-10. DOI: 10.1080/01485010151096504. View

5.
Collodel G, Moretti E, Capitani S, Piomboni P, Anichini C, Estenoz M . TEM, FISH and molecular studies in infertile men with pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. Andrologia. 2006; 38(4):122-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2006.00725.x. View