» Articles » PMID: 25080591

Connectivity Strength of Dissociable Striatal Tracts Predict Individual Differences in Temporal Discounting

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Aug 1
PMID 25080591
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large individual differences exist in the ability to delay gratification for the sake of satisfying longer-term goals. These individual differences are commonly assayed by studying intertemporal preferences, as revealed by choices between immediate and delayed rewards. In the brain, reward-based and goal-oriented decisions are believed to rely on the striatum and its interactions with other cortical and subcortical networks. However, it remains unknown which specific cortical-striatal tracts are involved in intertemporal decision making. We use connectivity analyses in both structural and functional MRI to further our understanding of the relationship between distinct corticostriatal networks and intertemporal preferences in humans. Our results revealed distinct striatal pathways that are differentially related to delay discounting. Structural and functional connectivity between striatum and lateral prefrontal cortex was associated with increased patience, whereas connectivity between subcortical areas and striatum was associated with increased impulsivity. These findings provide novel insights into how the anatomy and functioning of striatal circuits mediate individual differences in intertemporal choice.

Citing Articles

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Hot and Cool Executive Functions in Reward and Competition.

Lin H, Fung H, Wang Y, Ho R, Chen S Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943445 PMC: 11820429. DOI: 10.3390/s25030806.


Development of Self-Concept in Childhood and Adolescence: How Neuroscience Can Inform Theory and Vice Versa.

Crone E, van Drunen L Hum Dev. 2025; 68(5-6):255-271.

PMID: 39816529 PMC: 11734892. DOI: 10.1159/000539844.


Phasic dopamine release in two different rat models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) versus Lphn3 knockout rats.

Sable H, Paige N, Nalan P, Pace R, Hicks C, Regan S Neuroscience. 2025; 567:150-162.

PMID: 39756609 PMC: 11789927. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.037.


A structural MRI marker predicts individual differences in impulsivity and classifies patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia from matched controls.

Godefroy V, Durand A, Simon M, Weber B, Kable J, Lerman C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345385 PMC: 11429931. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612706.


Neural mechanisms of altruistic decision-making: EEG functional connectivity network analysis.

Mitiureva D, Terlichenko E, Zubko V, Kabanova P, Abrosimova V, Skripkina S Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(6):1109-1120.

PMID: 39198301 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01214-8.


References
1.
Kilts C, Schweitzer J, Quinn C, Gross R, Faber T, Muhammad F . Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58(4):334-41. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.334. View

2.
Somerville L, Casey B . Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20(2):236-41. PMC: 3014528. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.01.006. View

3.
Morrison S, Salzman C . Re-valuing the amygdala. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20(2):221-30. PMC: 2862774. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.007. View

4.
Kable J, Glimcher P . The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(12):1625-33. PMC: 2845395. DOI: 10.1038/nn2007. View

5.
Eisenberg D, MacKillop J, Modi M, Beauchemin J, Dang D, Lisman S . Examining impulsivity as an endophenotype using a behavioral approach: a DRD2 TaqI A and DRD4 48-bp VNTR association study. Behav Brain Funct. 2007; 3:2. PMC: 1781951. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-2. View