» Articles » PMID: 25072761

Interaction Between Fluids and Vasoactive Agents on Mortality in Septic Shock: a Multicenter, Observational Study

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2014 Jul 30
PMID 25072761
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Fluids and vasoactive agents are both used to treat septic shock, but little is known about how they interact or the optimal way to administer them. We sought to determine how hospital mortality was influenced by combined use of these two treatments.

Design: Retrospective evaluation using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital mortality and categorical variables representing initiation of vasoactive agents and volumes of IV fluids given 0-1, 1-6, and 6-24 hours after onset, including interactions and adjusting for potential confounders.

Setting: ICUs of 24 hospitals in 3 countries.

Patients: Two thousand eight hundred forty-nine patients who survived more than 24 hours after after onset of septic shock, admitted between 1989 and 2007.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: Fluids and vasoactive agents had strong, interacting associations with mortality (p < 0.0001). Mortality was lowest when vasoactive agents were begun 1-6 hours after onset, with more than 1 L of fluids in the initial hour after shock onset, more than 2.4 L from hours 1-6, and 1.6-3.5 L from 6 to 24 hours. The lowest mortality rates were associated with starting vasoactive agents 1-6 hours after onset.

Conclusions: The focus during the first hour of resuscitation for septic shock should be aggressive fluid administration, only thereafter starting vasoactive agents, while continuing aggressive fluid administration. Starting vasoactive agents in the initial hour may be detrimental, and not all of that association is due to less fluids being given with such early initiation of vasoactive agents.

Citing Articles

Mean arterial pressure at the initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute kidney injury.

Song H, Liao Y, Hu H, Wan Q Ren Fail. 2025; 47(1):2448582.

PMID: 39763014 PMC: 11721759. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2448582.


Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.

Park C, Ku N, Park D, Park J, Ha T, Kim D Acute Crit Care. 2024; 39(4):445-472.

PMID: 39622601 PMC: 11617831. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920.


Culture-negative sepsis may be a different entity from culture-positive sepsis: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.

Chang Y, Oh J, Oh D, Lee S, Hyun D, Park M Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):385.

PMID: 39587586 PMC: 11587757. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05151-3.


A Reinforcement Learning Model for Optimal Treatment Strategies in Intensive Care: Assessment of the Role of Cardiorespiratory Features.

Drudi C, Mollura M, Lehman L, Barbieri R IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 5:806-815.

PMID: 39559781 PMC: 11573419. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3367236.


Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study.

Vella R, Jones P, Keijzers G Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024; 12(1):e53.

PMID: 39290770 PMC: 11407533. DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2337.