» Articles » PMID: 25062838

Distracted and Down: Neural Mechanisms of Affective Interference in Subclinical Depression

Overview
Date 2014 Jul 27
PMID 25062838
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that depressed individuals have difficulty directing attention away from negative distractors, a phenomenon known as affective interference. However, findings are mixed regarding the neural mechanisms and network dynamics of affective interference. The present study addressed these issues by comparing neural activation during emotion-word and color-word Stroop tasks in participants with varying levels of (primarily subclinical) depression. Depressive symptoms predicted increased activation to negative distractors in areas of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), regions implicated in cognitive control and internally directed attention, respectively. Increased dACC activity was also observed in the group-average response to incongruent distractors, suggesting that dACC activity during affective interference is related to overtaxed cognitive control. In contrast, regions of PCC were deactivated across the group in response to incongruent distractors, suggesting that PCC activity during affective interference represents task-independent processing. A psychophysiological interaction emerged in which higher depression predicted more positively correlated activity between dACC and PCC during affective interference, i.e. greater connectivity between cognitive control and internal-attention systems. These findings suggest that, when individuals high in depression are confronted by negative material, increased attention to internal thoughts and difficulty shifting resources to the external world interfere with goal-directed behavior.

Citing Articles

A stacking classifier for distinguishing stages of Alzheimer's disease from a subnetwork perspective.

Li G, Chen B, Sun W, Liu Z Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19(1):38.

PMID: 39926335 PMC: 11799466. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-025-10221-5.


Increased default mode network activation in depression and social anxiety during upward social comparison.

Acuna A, Acuna A, Morales S, Morales S, Uriarte-Gaspari L, Uriarte-Gaspari L Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025; 20(1).

PMID: 39882939 PMC: 11792650. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaf012.


Brain mechanisms of rumination and negative self-referential processing in adolescent depression.

Murray L, Jaffe N, Tierney A, Pidvirny K, Balkind E, Abbasi B J Affect Disord. 2024; 366:83-90.

PMID: 39191310 PMC: 11468901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.114.


Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.

Prompiengchai S, Dunlop K Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 50(1):230-245.

PMID: 38951585 PMC: 11525717. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01907-1.


Effects of Cortisol Administration on Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Women with Depression.

Runyan A, Cassani A, Reyna L, Walsh E, Hoks R, Birn R Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023; 337:111760.

PMID: 38039780 PMC: 10843737. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111760.


References
1.
Johnstone T, van Reekum C, Urry H, Kalin N, Davidson R . Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(33):8877-84. PMC: 6672169. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-07.2007. View

2.
Dosenbach N, Visscher K, Palmer E, Miezin F, Wenger K, Kang H . A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron. 2006; 50(5):799-812. PMC: 3621133. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.031. View

3.
Andrews-Hanna J, Kaiser R, Turner A, Reineberg A, Godinez D, Dimidjian S . A penny for your thoughts: dimensions of self-generated thought content and relationships with individual differences in emotional wellbeing. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:900. PMC: 3843223. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00900. View

4.
Widiger T, Samuel D . Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005; 114(4):494-504. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494. View

5.
Koster E, De Lissnyder E, Derakshan N, De Raedt R . Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: the impaired disengagement hypothesis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010; 31(1):138-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.005. View