» Articles » PMID: 2506259

Variations and Comparisons in Medium-depth Chemical Peeling

Overview
Date 1989 Sep 1
PMID 2506259
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two effective methods in chemical peeling, solid carbon dioxide plus trichloroacetic acid and Jessner's solution plus trichloroacetic acid, were compared clinically with photographs and histologically with serial biopsies. Carbon dioxide produced a deeper wound than Jessner's solution, and CO2 + TCA was slightly deeper than Jessner's + TCA but was probably not significantly deeper from a clinical standpoint except in correcting scarring. Triple consecutive applications of TCA can substantially increase wound depth with both combination peels.

Citing Articles

A comparative study of 70% glycolic acid and 30% trichloroacetic acid peel in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars: A split-face study.

Manjhi M, Sagar V, Yadav P, Dabas G, Gupta A, Pratap P J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2024; 17(3):227-233.

PMID: 39483653 PMC: 11497560. DOI: 10.25259/jcas_117_23.


A Practical Approach to Chemical Peels: A Review of Fundamentals and Step-by-step Algorithmic Protocol for Treatment.

Soleymani T, Lanoue J, Rahman Z J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018; 11(8):21-28.

PMID: 30214663 PMC: 6122508.


Chemical peels in the treatment of acne: patient selection and perspectives.

Castillo D, Keri J Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018; 11:365-372.

PMID: 30038512 PMC: 6053170. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S137788.


Chemical reconstruction of skin scars therapy using 100% trichloroacetic Acid in the treatment of atrophic facial post varicella scars: a pilot study.

Agarwal N, Mittal A, Kuldeep C, Gupta L, Khare A, Mehta S J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013; 6(3):144-7.

PMID: 24163530 PMC: 3800288. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.118408.


The comparison between trichloroacetic Acid 50% and co(2) laser in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis scar.

Nilforoushzadeh M, Jaffary F, Ansari N, Moradi S, Siadat A Indian J Dermatol. 2011; 56(2):171-3.

PMID: 21716542 PMC: 3108516. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.80411.