» Articles » PMID: 25058143

Diffusion Weighted MR and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement in Classification and Characterization of Noncystic Focal Liver Lesions: Does a Clinical Role Exist?

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Jul 25
PMID 25058143
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analysis in noncystic focal liver lesion (FLL) classification/characterization.Six hundred liver magnetic resonances with multi-b (b = 50, 400, 800 s/mm) diffusion-weighted imaging (DwI) were retrospectively reviewed. Mean ADC was measured in 388 lesions (195 benign and 193 malignant) excluding internal necrotic areas. Cystic benign lesions were excluded from analysis. Sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions were calculated. Analysis of variance was performed to detect differences among subgroups of solid lesions.Mean ADC of malignant lesions was 0.980 × 10 mm/s, significantly (P < 0.05) lower than mean ADC of benign lesions (1.433 × 10 mm/s). Applying an ADC cutoff of 1.066 × 10 mm/s, specificity and sensitivity for malignancy were respectively 86.6% and 73.6%. Of all lesions, >1/3 (39.5%) presented values lower than 1 × 10 mm/s, with 90.0% chance of malignancy. Above 1.5 × 10 mm/s (about 20% of all lesions) chance of malignancy was 9.5%.DwI cannot assist in noncystic FLL characterization, but can help in FLL classification in about half the cases.

Citing Articles

3D variable flip angle T1 mapping for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions at 3T: comparison with diffusion weighted imaging.

Wang F, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Liu M, Zhu J BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):146.

PMID: 35982406 PMC: 9389795. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00873-8.


Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for the differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma liver metastases.

Yilmaz T, Gultekin M, Turk H, Besiroglu M, Cesme D, Simsek M Radiol Oncol. 2021; 56(1):54-59.

PMID: 34957725 PMC: 8884850. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0052.


Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nalaini F, Shahbazi F, Mousavinezhad S, Ansari A, Salehi M Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1123):20210059.

PMID: 34111960 PMC: 8248227. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210059.


Meta-analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating focal lesions of the liver.

Wu H, Liang Y, Jiang X, Wei X, Liu Y, Liu W Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(34):e12071.

PMID: 30142864 PMC: 6112959. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012071.

References
1.
Colagrande S, Pasquinelli F, Mazzoni L, Belli G, Virgili G . MR-diffusion weighted imaging of healthy liver parenchyma: repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(4):912-20. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22117. View

2.
Xu L, Cai S, Cai G, Peng W . Imaging diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(42):4654-9. PMC: 3237298. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4654. View

3.
Colagrande S, Regini F, Pasquinelli F, Mazzoni L, Mungai F, Filippone A . Focal liver lesion classification and characterization in noncirrhotic liver: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance-related parameters. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013; 37(4):560-7. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182951fe9. View

4.
Filipe J, Curvo-Semedo L, Casalta-Lopes J, Marques M, Caseiro-Alves F . Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions and effect of ROI methods on ADC measurements. MAGMA. 2012; 26(3):303-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0348-1. View

5.
Kele P, van der Jagt E . Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(13):1567-76. PMC: 2848365. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1567. View