» Articles » PMID: 25033734

The Discovery of First-in-class Drugs: Origins and Evolution

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Jul 19
PMID 25033734
Citations 154
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Analysis of the origins of new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1999 to 2008 suggested that phenotypic screening strategies had been more productive than target-based approaches in the discovery of first-in-class small-molecule drugs. However, given the relatively recent introduction of target-based approaches in the context of the long time frames of drug development, their full impact might not yet have become apparent. Here, we present an analysis of the origins of all 113 first-in-class drugs approved by the FDA from 1999 to 2013, which shows that the majority (78) were discovered through target-based approaches (45 small-molecule drugs and 33 biologics). In addition, of 33 drugs identified in the absence of a target hypothesis, 25 were found through a chemocentric approach in which compounds with known pharmacology served as the starting point, with only eight coming from what we define here as phenotypic screening: testing a large number of compounds in a target-agnostic assay that monitors phenotypic changes. We also discuss the implications for drug discovery strategies, including viewing phenotypic screening as a novel discipline rather than as a neoclassical approach.

Citing Articles

Old drugs, new challenges: reassigning drugs for cancer therapies.

Czechowicz P, Wiech-Walow A, Slawski J, Collawn J, Bartoszewski R Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025; 30(1):27.

PMID: 40038587 PMC: 11881393. DOI: 10.1186/s11658-025-00710-0.


The role and application of bioinformatics techniques and tools in drug discovery.

Zhang S, Liu K, Liu Y, Hu X, Gu X Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1547131.

PMID: 40017606 PMC: 11865229. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547131.


Empowering High Throughput Screening of 3D Models: Automated Dispensing of Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Cells.

Seymour S, Cadena I, Johnson M, Thakkar R, Jenne M, Adem I Cell Mol Bioeng. 2025; 18(1):71-82.

PMID: 39949489 PMC: 11813830. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-024-00841-y.


Advances in the Repurposing and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrance of Drugs in Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Rechberger J, Toll S, Biswas S, You H, Chow W, Kendall N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941807 PMC: 11816256. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030439.


Enantioselective Protein Affinity Selection Mass Spectrometry (EAS-MS).

Wang X, Sun J, Ahmad S, Yang D, Li F, Chan U bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896675 PMC: 11785093. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.17.633682.


References
1.
David E, Tramontin T, Zemmel R . Pharmaceutical R&D: the road to positive returns. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009; 8(8):609-10. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2948. View

2.
Hellerstein M . A critique of the molecular target-based drug discovery paradigm based on principles of metabolic control: advantages of pathway-based discovery. Metab Eng. 2007; 10(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2007.09.003. View

3.
Filippakopoulos P, Qi J, Picaud S, Shen Y, Smith W, Fedorov O . Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010; 468(7327):1067-73. PMC: 3010259. DOI: 10.1038/nature09504. View

4.
Kessel D, Hall T, Wodinsky I . Transport and phosphorylation as factors in the antitumor action of cytosine arabinoside. Science. 1967; 156(3779):1240-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.156.3779.1240. View

5.
Horrobin D . Realism in drug discovery-could Cassandra be right?. Nat Biotechnol. 2001; 19(12):1099-100. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1201-1099. View