» Articles » PMID: 25028073

Evaluation of Felodipine As a Potential Perpetrator of Pharmacokinetic Drug-drug Interactions

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Jul 17
PMID 25028073
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate felodipine as a potential perpetrator of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (PK-DDIs) involving cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and P-glycoprotein (P-gp).

Methods: Felodipine extended-release 10 mg was administered daily to six healthy subjects for 7 days (days 1-7). Subjects were administered a modified Inje cocktail comprising the selective probe substrates caffeine 100 mg (CYP1A2), losartan 25 mg (CYP2C9), omeprazole 20 mg (CYP2C19), dextromethorphan 30 mg (CYP2D6), midazolam 2 mg (CYP3A) and digoxin 250 μg (P-gp) on day 0 (prior to felodipine exposure) and day 7 (after felodipine exposure). Plasma samples were collected over 24 h and drug concentrations measured by UPLC-MS/MS.

Results: The geometric means of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios (probe AUC after felodipine exposure/probe AUC prior to felodipine exposure) and 95% confidence intervals for each probe were: caffeine 0.91 (0.64-1.30), losartan 1.05 (0.95-1.15), omeprazole 1.17 (0.78-1.76), dextromethorphan 1.46 (1.00-2.12), midazolam 1.23 (0.99-1.52) and digoxin 1.01 (0.89-1.15).

Conclusion: Felodipine may be a weak in vivo inhibitor of CYP3A and CYP2D6 but is unlikely to act as a significant perpetrator of PK-DDIs.

Citing Articles

Clinical assessment of gepotidacin (GSK2140944) as a victim and perpetrator of drug-drug interactions via CYP3A metabolism and transporters.

Barth A, Perry C, Shabbir S, Zamek-Gliszczynski M, Thomas S, Dumont E Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 16(4):647-661.

PMID: 36642822 PMC: 10087077. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13477.


Napabucasin Drug-Drug Interaction Potential, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Dosing in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Dai X, Karol M, Hitron M, Hard M, Goulet M, McLaughlin C Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021; 10(8):824-839.

PMID: 34107166 PMC: 8453567. DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.961.


Simultaneous Determination of Five Cytochrome P450 Probe Substrates and Their Metabolites and Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide Probe Substrate in Human Plasma Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Heo J, Kim H, Lee G, Ohk B, Lee S, Song K Pharmaceutics. 2018; 10(3).

PMID: 30004443 PMC: 6160928. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030079.


Combined Antihypertensive Effect of Paeoniflorin Enriched Extract and Metoprolol in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats.

Li B, Yang Z, Lei S, Su J, Jin Z, Chen S Pharmacogn Mag. 2018; 14(53):44-52.

PMID: 29576700 PMC: 5858241. DOI: 10.4103/pm.pm_483_16.


Assessment of inter-racial variability in CYP3A4 activity and inducibility among healthy adult males of Caucasian and South Asian ancestries.

van Dyk M, Marshall J, Sorich M, Wood L, Rowland A Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 74(7):913-920.

PMID: 29572563 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-018-2450-4.


References
1.
Kirby B, Kharasch E, Thummel K, Narang V, Hoffer C, Unadkat J . Simultaneous measurement of in vivo P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A activities. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 46(11):1313-9. DOI: 10.1177/0091270006292625. View

2.
Greiner B, Eichelbaum M, Fritz P, Kreichgauer H, von Richter O, Zundler J . The role of intestinal P-glycoprotein in the interaction of digoxin and rifampin. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(2):147-53. PMC: 408477. DOI: 10.1172/JCI6663. View

3.
Williamson K, Patterson J, McQueen R, Adams Jr K, Pieper J . Effects of erythromycin or rifampin on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 63(3):316-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90163-1. View

4.
De Smet M, Schoors D, De Meyer G, Verbesselt R, Goldberg M, Fitzpatrick V . Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995; 40(6):571-5. PMC: 1365213. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb05802.x. View

5.
Lahiri D, Bye S, Nurnberger Jr J, Hodes M, Crisp M . A non-organic and non-enzymatic extraction method gives higher yields of genomic DNA from whole-blood samples than do nine other methods tested. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1992; 25(4):193-205. DOI: 10.1016/0165-022x(92)90014-2. View