» Articles » PMID: 25018737

Neural Correlates of Suspiciousness and Interactions with Anxiety During Emotional and Neutral Word Processing

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2014 Jul 15
PMID 25018737
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Suspiciousness is usually classified as a symptom of psychosis, but it also occurs in depression and anxiety disorders. Though how suspiciousness overlaps with depression is not obvious, suspiciousness does seem to overlap with anxious apprehension and anxious arousal (e.g., verbal iterative processes and vigilance about environmental threat). However, suspiciousness also has unique characteristics (e.g., concern about harm from others and vigilance about social threat). Given that both anxiety and suspiciousness have been associated with abnormalities in emotion processing, it is unclear whether it is the unique characteristics of suspiciousness or the overlap with anxiety that drive abnormalities in emotion processing. Event-related brain potentials were obtained during an emotion-word Stroop task. Results indicated that suspiciousness interacts with anxious apprehension to modulate initial stimulus perception processes. Suspiciousness is associated with attention to all stimuli regardless of emotion content. In contrast, anxious arousal is associated with a later response to emotion stimuli only. These results suggest that suspiciousness and anxious apprehension share overlapping processes, but suspiciousness alone is associated with a hyperactive early vigilance response. Depression did not interact with suspiciousness to predict response to emotion stimuli. These findings suggest that it may be informative to assess suspiciousness in conjunction with anxiety in order to better understand how these symptoms interact and contribute to dysfunctional emotion processing.

Citing Articles

Sensory Emotion in Words: Evidence From an Event-related Potential (ERP) Study in Light of the Emotioncy Model.

Tabatabaee Farani S, Pishghadam R, Khodaverdi A Basic Clin Neurosci. 2024; 14(6):773-786.

PMID: 39070201 PMC: 11273207. DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2021.1870.1.


How Psychological Variables Maybe Correlated with Willingness to Get COVID-19 Vaccine: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of Polish Novice Nurses.

Gotlib J, Jaworski M, Cieslak I, Sobierajski T, Wawrzuta D, Malkowski P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36497862 PMC: 9740348. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315787.


Childhood abuse history and attention bias in adults.

Letkiewicz A, Silton R, Mimnaugh K, Miller G, Heller W, Fisher J Psychophysiology. 2020; 57(10):e13627.

PMID: 32633826 PMC: 9374105. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13627.


Vulnerability to Psychosis, Ideas of Reference and Evaluation with an Implicit Test.

Bendala-Rodriguez P, Senin-Calderon C, Peluso-Crespi L, Rodriguez-Testal J J Clin Med. 2019; 8(11).

PMID: 31766179 PMC: 6912563. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111956.


Extreme-groups designs in studies of dimensional phenomena: Advantages, caveats, and recommendations.

Fisher J, Guha A, Heller W, Miller G J Abnorm Psychol. 2019; 129(1):14-20.

PMID: 31657600 PMC: 6928394. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000480.


References
1.
Zinbarg R, Barlow D . Structure of anxiety and the anxiety disorders: a hierarchical model. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996; 105(2):181-93. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.2.181. View

2.
Mathews A, MacLeod C . Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behav Res Ther. 1985; 23(5):563-9. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90104-4. View

3.
Carretie L, Mercado F, Tapia M, Hinojosa J . Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001; 41(1):75-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00195-1. View

4.
Berenbaum H, Boden M, Baker J, Dizen M, Thompson R, Abramowitz A . Emotional correlates of the different dimensions of schizotypal personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006; 115(2):359-68. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.359. View

5.
Thomas S, Johnstone S, Gonsalvez C . Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006; 63(3):221-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.10.002. View