Once-weekly Dulaglutide Versus Once-daily Liraglutide in Metformin-treated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (AWARD-6): a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3, Non-inferiority Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Dulaglutide and liraglutide, both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, improve glycaemic control and reduce weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a head-to-head trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide with that of once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.
Methods: We did a phase 3, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study at 62 sites in nine countries between June 20, 2012, and Nov 25, 2013. Patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes receiving metformin (≥1500 mg/day), aged 18 years or older, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7·0% or greater (≥53 mmol/mol) and 10·0% or lower (≤86 mmol/mol), and body-mass index 45 kg/m(2) or lower were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (1·5 mg) or once-daily liraglutide (1·8 mg). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was non-inferiority (margin 0·4%) of dulaglutide compared with liraglutide for change in HbA1c (least-squares mean change from baseline) at 26 weeks. Safety data were collected for a further 4 weeks' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01624259.
Findings: We randomly assigned 599 patients to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (299 patients) or once-daily liraglutide (300 patients). 269 participants in each group completed treatment at week 26. Least-squares mean reduction in HbA1c was -1·42% (SE 0·05) in the dulaglutide group and -1·36% (0·05) in the liraglutide group. Mean treatment difference in HbA1c was -0·06% (95% CI -0·19 to 0·07, pnon-inferiority<0·0001) between the two groups. The most common gastrointestinal adverse events were nausea (61 [20%] in dulaglutide group vs 54 [18%] in liraglutide group), diarrhoea (36 [12%] vs 36 [12%]), dyspepsia (24 [8%] vs 18 [6%]), and vomiting (21 [7%] vs 25 [8%]), with similar rates of study or study drug discontinuation because of adverse events between the two groups (18 [6%] in each group). The hypoglycaemia rate was 0·34 (SE 1·44) and 0·52 (3·01) events per patient per year, respectively, and no severe hypoglycaemia was reported.
Interpretation: Once-weekly dulaglutide is non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide for least-squares mean reduction in HbA1c, with a similar safety and tolerability profile.
Funding: Eli Lilly and Company.
Messak M, Abdelmageed A, Senbel A, Khattab Y, Mandour Y, Shaker O Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025; .
PMID: 40067438 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-025-03932-3.
Yang Y, He L, Han S, Yang N, Liu Y, Wang X J Diabetes. 2025; 17(3):e70063.
PMID: 40040445 PMC: 11880690. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70063.
Douros J, Flak J, Knerr P Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1530985.
PMID: 39963285 PMC: 11830610. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1530985.
Ayoub M, Chela H, Amin N, Hunter R, Anwar J, Tahan V J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).
PMID: 39941615 PMC: 11818918. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030944.
Mlynarska E, Czarnik W, Dzieza N, Jedraszak W, Majchrowicz G, Prusinowski F Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).
PMID: 39940862 PMC: 11817707. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031094.