» Articles » PMID: 25015477

Conventional and Genetic Talent Identification in Sports: Will Recent Developments Trace Talent?

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jul 13
PMID 25015477
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of talent identification (TI) is the earliest possible selection of auspicious athletes with the goal of systematically maximizing their potential. The literature proposes excellent reviews on various facets of talent research on different scientific issues such as sports sciences or genetics. However, the approaches of conventional and genetic testing have only been discussed separately by and for the respective groups of interest. In this article, we combine the discoveries of these disciplines into a single review to provide a comprehensive overview and elucidate the prevailing limitations. Fundamental problems in TI reside in the difficulties of defining the construct ‘talent’ or groups of different performance levels that represent the target variable of testing. Conventional and genetic testing reveal a number of methodological and technical limitations, and parallels are summarised in terms of the test designs, the point in time of testing, psychological skills or traits and unknown interactions between different variables. In conclusion, many deficiencies in the current talent research have gained attention. Alternative solutions include the talent development approach, while genetic testing is re-emphasised as a tool for risk stratification in sport participation. Future research needs to clearly define the group of interest and comprehensively implement all methodological improvement suggestions.

Citing Articles

Important features of bench press performance in non-disabled and Para athletes: A scoping review.

Buhmann R, Sayers M, OBrien J, Borg D PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0310127.

PMID: 39527599 PMC: 11554178. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310127.


Differences and relationships between talent detection, identification, development and selection in sport: A systematic review.

Zhao J, Xiang C, Tengku Kamalden T, Dong W, Luo H, Ismail N Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27543.

PMID: 38515693 PMC: 10955260. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27543.


The effects of cognitive-motor dual-task training on athletes' cognition and motor performance.

Wu J, Qiu P, Lv S, Chen M, Li Y Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1284787.

PMID: 38390413 PMC: 10881661. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284787.


Mechanistic or Relational Worldview for Talent Identification Research in Sport Science? Both-But With a Preference!.

Charbonnet B, Conzelmann A J Pers Oriented Res. 2023; 9(2):51-74.

PMID: 38107202 PMC: 10722373. DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2023.25813.


Effects of Early Talent Promotion on Junior and Senior Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gullich A, Barth M Sports Med. 2023; 54(3):697-710.

PMID: 37921913 PMC: 10978645. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01957-3.


References
1.
Burgess D, Naughton G . Talent development in adolescent team sports: a review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010; 5(1):103-16. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.5.1.103. View

2.
Beunen G, Thomis M . Genetic determinants of sports participation and daily physical activity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999; 23 Suppl 3:S55-63. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800885. View

3.
Votteler A, Honer O . The relative age effect in the German Football TID Programme: biases in motor performance diagnostics and effects on single motor abilities and skills in groups of selected players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013; 14(5):433-42. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2013.837510. View

4.
Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Vaeyens R, Pion J, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R . Factors discriminating gymnasts by competitive level. Int J Sports Med. 2011; 32(8):591-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1275300. View

5.
Phillips E, Davids K, Renshaw I, Portus M . Expert performance in sport and the dynamics of talent development. Sports Med. 2010; 40(4):271-83. DOI: 10.2165/11319430-000000000-00000. View