» Articles » PMID: 25015013

The Use of a Low Cost 3D Scanning and Printing Tool in the Manufacture of Custom-made Foot Orthoses: a Preliminary Study

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jul 13
PMID 25015013
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Custom foot orthoses are currently recognized as the gold standard for treatment of foot and lower limb pathology. While foam and plaster casting methods are most widely used in clinical practice, technology has emerged, permitting the use of 3D scanning, computer aided design (CAD) and computer aided manufacturing (CAM) for fabrication of foot molds and custom foot orthotic components. Adoption of 3D printing, as a form of CAM, requires further investigation for use as a clinical tool.This study provides a preliminary description of a new method to manufacture foot orthoses using a novel 3D scanner and printer and compare gait kinematic outputs from shod and traditional plaster casted orthotics.

Findings: One participant (male, 25 years) was included with no lower extremity injuries. Foot molds were created from both plaster casting and 3D scanning/printing methods. Custom foot orthoses were then fabricated from each mold. Lower body plug-in-gait with the Oxford Foot Model on the right foot was collected for both orthotic and control (shod) conditions. The medial longitudinal arch was measured using arch height index (AHI) where a decrease in AHI represented a drop in arch height. The lowest AHI was 21.2 mm in the running shoes, followed by 21.4 mm wearing the orthoses made using 3D scanning and printing, with the highest AHI of 22.0 mm while the participant wore the plaster casted orthoses.

Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated a small increase in AHI with the 3D printing orthotic compared to the shod condition. A larger sample size may demonstrate significant patterns for the tested conditions.

Citing Articles

Does Scanner Choice Matter for the Design of Foot Orthosis?.

Chhikara K, Suresh S, Morrison S, Hartley D, Evans K, Wille M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943509 PMC: 11820986. DOI: 10.3390/s25030869.


Comparison of accuracy and speed between plaster casting, high-cost and low-cost 3D scanners to capture foot, ankle and lower leg morphology of children requiring ankle-foot orthoses.

Farhan M, Wang J, Warncke R, Cheng T, Burns J J Foot Ankle Res. 2024; 17(3):e70006.

PMID: 39192458 PMC: 11349604. DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.70006.


Empowering Rehabilitation: Design and Structural Analysis of a Low-Cost 3D-Printed Smart Orthosis.

Popister F, Dragomir M, Ciudin P, Goia H Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38794496 PMC: 11125049. DOI: 10.3390/polym16101303.


Novel use of structural equation modeling to examine the development of a framework of patient-centered two-way referral systems for building digital subjective well-being healthcare: A cross-sectional survey in Central China.

Wen X, Song Q, OuYang S, Yao Z, Luo Y Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241253079.

PMID: 38715974 PMC: 11075614. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241253079.


A Review on 3D Scanners Studies for Producing Customized Orthoses.

Silva R, Silva B, Fernandes C, Morouco P, Alves N, Veloso A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(5).

PMID: 38474907 PMC: 10935386. DOI: 10.3390/s24051373.


References
1.
Chuter V, Payne C, Miller K . Variability of neutral-position casting of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003; 93(1):1-5. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-93-1-1. View

2.
Shultz R, Jenkyn T . Determining the maximum diameter for holes in the shoe without compromising shoe integrity when using a multi-segment foot model. Med Eng Phys. 2011; 34(1):118-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.06.017. View

3.
Schrank E, Hitch L, Wallace K, Moore R, Stanhope S . Assessment of a virtual functional prototyping process for the rapid manufacture of passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses. J Biomech Eng. 2013; 135(10):101011-7. DOI: 10.1115/1.4024825. View

4.
Khoshelham K, Elberink S . Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 12(2):1437-54. PMC: 3304120. DOI: 10.3390/s120201437. View

5.
Landorf K, Keenan A, Rushworth R . Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001; 91(4):174-83. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-91-4-174. View