» Articles » PMID: 25010690

System Vaccinology for the Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Safety by Multiplex Gene Detection of Novel Biomarkers in a Preclinical Study and Batch Release Test

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jul 11
PMID 25010690
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vaccines are beneficial and universal tools to prevent infectious disease. Thus, safety of vaccines is strictly evaluated in the preclinical phase of trials and every vaccine batch must be tested by the National Control Laboratories according to the guidelines published by each country. Despite many vaccine production platforms and methods, animal testing for safety evaluation is unchanged thus far. We recently developed a systems biological approach to vaccine safety evaluation where identification of specific biomarkers in a rat pre-clinical study evaluated the safety of vaccines for pandemic H5N1 influenza including Irf7, Lgals9, Lgalsbp3, Cxcl11, Timp1, Tap2, Psmb9, Psme1, Tapbp, C2, Csf1, Mx2, Zbp1, Ifrd1, Trafd1, Cxcl9, β2m, Npc1, Ngfr and Ifi47. The current study evaluated whether these 20 biomarkers could evaluate the safety, batch-to-batch and manufacturer-to-manufacturer consistency of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine using a multiplex gene detection system. When we evaluated the influenza HA vaccine (HAv) from four different manufactures, the biomarker analysis correlated to findings from conventional animal use tests, such as abnormal toxicity test. In addition, sensitivity of toxicity detection and differences in HAvs were higher and more accurate than with conventional methods. Despite a slight decrease in body weight caused by HAv from manufacturer B that was not statistically significant, our results suggest that HAv from manufacturer B is significantly different than the other HAvs tested with regard to Lgals3bp, Tapbp, Lgals9, Irf7 and C2 gene expression in rat lungs. Using the biomarkers confirmed in this study, we predicted batch-to-batch consistency and safety of influenza vaccines within 2 days compared with the conventional safety test, which takes longer. These biomarkers will facilitate the future development of new influenza vaccines and provide an opportunity to develop in vitro methods of evaluating batch-to-batch consistency and vaccine safety as an alternative to animal testing.

Citing Articles

Personalized cancer vaccine design using AI-powered technologies.

Kumar A, Dixit S, Srinivasan K, M D, Vincent P Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1357217.

PMID: 39582860 PMC: 11581883. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1357217.


Feasibility of Using a Type I IFN-Based Non-Animal Approach to Predict Vaccine Efficacy and Safety Profiles.

Abdel-Haq H Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38932312 PMC: 11209158. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12060583.


Tfh Cells in Health and Immunity: Potential Targets for Systems Biology Approaches to Vaccination.

Law H, Venturi V, Kelleher A, Munier C Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(22).

PMID: 33198297 PMC: 7696930. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228524.


Immunogenicity and Toxicity of Different Adjuvants Can Be Characterized by Profiling Lung Biomarker Genes After Nasal Immunization.

Sasaki E, Asanuma H, Momose H, Furuhata K, Mizukami T, Hamaguchi I Front Immunol. 2020; 11:2171.

PMID: 33013912 PMC: 7516075. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02171.


Vaccine hesitancy : Report of a student study group.

Weitz L, Bellach L, Faltum A, Berger A, Maurer W Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020; 132(9-10):243-252.

PMID: 32322962 PMC: 7223449. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-020-01655-4.


References
1.
Nicholson K, Tyrrell D, Harrison P, POTTER C, Jennings R, Clark A . Clinical studies of monovalent inactivated whole virus and subunit A/USSR/77 (H1N1) vaccine: serological responses and clinical reactions. J Biol Stand. 1979; 7(2):123-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-1157(79)80044-x. View

2.
Pulendran B, Li S, Nakaya H . Systems vaccinology. Immunity. 2010; 33(4):516-29. PMC: 3001343. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006. View

3.
Hamaguchi I, Imai J, Momose H, Kawamura M, Mizukami T, Kato H . Two vaccine toxicity-related genes Agp and Hpx could prove useful for pertussis vaccine safety control. Vaccine. 2007; 25(17):3355-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.12.059. View

4.
Wong S, Webby R . Traditional and new influenza vaccines. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26(3):476-92. PMC: 3719499. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00097-12. View

5.
Franco L, Bucasas K, Wells J, Nino D, Wang X, Zapata G . Integrative genomic analysis of the human immune response to influenza vaccination. Elife. 2013; 2:e00299. PMC: 3713456. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00299. View