» Articles » PMID: 25009398

Comparative Quality of Life Study Between Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Surgical Choledochotomy

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2014 Jul 11
PMID 25009398
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To determine quality of life improvement in choledocholithiasis patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) versus open choledochotomy (OCT).

Methods: Eligible choledocholithiasis patients (n = 216) hospitalized in the Changhai Hospital between May 2010 and January 2011 were enrolled into a prospective study using cluster sampling. Patients underwent EST (n = 135) or OCT (n = 81) depending on the patient's wishes. Patients were followed-up with a field survey and by correspondence. Patients were also given the self-administered Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) to measure patient quality of life before surgery, and at two and six weeks after the procedures.

Results: With respect to baseline patient characteristics, the EST and OCT groups were comparable. After the procedure, gallstones were completely eliminated in all patients. Among 216 eligible patients, 191 patients (88.4%) completed all three surveys, including 118 patients who underwent EST (118/135; 87.4%) and 73 patients who underwent OCT (73/81; 90.1%). EST was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay than OCT (8.8 ± 6.5 vs 13.9 ± 6.7 d; P < 0.001). The GIQLI score was similar between the EST and OCT groups before cholelithotomy (103.0 ± 15.4 vs 99.7 ± 10.2), but increased significantly in the EST group at two weeks (113.4 ± 12.0 vs 107.2 ± 11.2; P < 0.001) and six weeks (120.7 ± 10.6 vs 116.9 ± 7.5; P < 0.05) after the procedures.

Conclusion: EST, compared with OCT, is associated with better postoperative quality of life in patients treated for choledocholithiasis.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Zhou X, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Yu M, Zhong C, Liu Z World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(4):485-497.

PMID: 30700944 PMC: 6350168. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.485.


Clinical research for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Wang Y, Han Z, Niu X, Jia Y, Yuan H, Zhang G Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(4):5753-9.

PMID: 26131161 PMC: 4483953.

References
1.
Wojtun S, Gil J, Gietka W, Gil M . Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients. Endoscopy. 1997; 29(4):258-65. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004186. View

2.
Lee J, Kim H, Kang D, Choi C, Park S, Kim S . Usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for removal of difficult common bile duct stones. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46(1):65-70. PMC: 3572354. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.1.65. View

3.
Ambreen M, Shaikh A, Jamal A, Qureshi J, Dalwani A, Memon M . Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Asian J Surg. 2009; 32(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60004-X. View

4.
Sugiyama M, Atomi Y . Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg. 1998; 85(7):917-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00750.x. View

5.
Wu X, Yang Y, Dong P, Gu J, Lu J, Li M . Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012; 397(6):909-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4. View