Effect of Healing Time on Bone-implant Contact of Orthodontic Micro-implants: a Histologic Study

Overview

Journal ISRN Dent

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2014 Jul 10

PMID 25006463

Citations 4

Authors

Barat Ali Ramazanzadeh

Kazem Fatemi

Mahboobe Dehghani

Nooshin Mohtasham

Arezoo Jahanbin

Hamed Sadeghian

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of immediate and delayed loading of orthodontic micro-implants on bone-implant contact. Materials and Methods. Sixty four micro-implants were implanted in dog's jaw bone. The micro-implants were divided into loaded and unloaded (control) groups. The control group had two subgroups: four and eight weeks being implanted. The loaded group had two subgroups of immediate loading and delayed (after four weeks healing) loading. Loaded samples were subjected to 200g load for four weeks. After sacrificing the animals micro-implants and surrounding tissues were observed histologically. Bone-implant contact ratios (BIC) were calculated and different groups' results were compared by three-way ANOVA. Results. Mean survival rate was 96.7% in general. Survival rates were 96.7%, 94.4% and 100% for control, immediate and delayed loaded groups, respectively. BIC values were not significantly different in loaded and control groups, immediate and delayed loading groups, and pressure and tension sides. Mandibular micro-implants had significantly higher BIC than maxillary ones in immediate loading, 4-weeks control, and 8-weeks control groups (P = 0.021, P = 0.009, P = 0.003, resp.). Conclusion Immediate or delayed loading of micro-implants in dog did not cause significant difference in Bone-implant contact which could be concluded that healing time had not significant effect on micro-implant stability.

Citing Articles

Survival analysis of temporary anchorage devices: A retrospective analysis in a Nigerian orthodontic patient population.

Umeh O, Offojebe U, Isiekwe I, Utomi I, daCosta O J Orthod Sci. 2023; 12:45.

PMID: 37881656 PMC: 10597358. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_10_23.

Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study.

Matys J, Flieger R, Gedrange T, Janowicz K, Kempisty B, Grzech-Lesniak K Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(10).

PMID: 32423127 PMC: 7287787. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102265.

Biomechanical Effects of Various Bone-Implant Interfaces on the Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: A Finite Element Study.

Tan F, Wang C, Yang C, Huang Y, Fan Y J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017:7495606.

PMID: 29065641 PMC: 5494564. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7495606.

Analysis of time to failure of orthodontic mini-implants after insertion or loading.

Jeong J, Kim J, Lee N, Kim Y, Lee J, Kim T J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 41(5):240-5.

PMID: 26568925 PMC: 4641214. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.5.240.

References

Woods P, Buschang P, Owens S, Rossouw P, Opperman L . The effect of force, timing, and location on bone-to-implant contact of miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 31(3):232-40. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn091. View

Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T . Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(4):373-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00565-1. View

Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield Jr J, Roberts W, Garetto L . The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res. 2003; 82(5):377-81. DOI: 10.1177/154405910308200510. View

Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B . Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998; 13(3):201-9. View

Moon C, Lee D, Lee H, Im J, Baek S . Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(1):101-6. DOI: 10.2319/121706-515.1. View

Takaki T, Tamura N, Yamamoto M, Takano N, Shibahara T, Yasumura T . Clinical study of temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic treatment--stability of micro/mini-screws and mini-plates: experience with 455 cases. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010; 51(3):151-63. DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.51.151. View

Freudenthaler J, Haas R, Bantleon H . Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: a preliminary report on clinical applications. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(4):358-63. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004358.x. View

Freire J, Silva N, Gil J, Magini R, Coelho P . Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131(6):704.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.040. View

Romanos G, Toh C, Siar C, Wicht H, Yacoob H, Nentwig G . Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey. J Periodontol. 2003; 74(10):1483-90. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.10.1483. View

10.

Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Piattelli A . Histologic evaluation of a human immediately loaded titanium implant with a porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002; 4(2):110-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00160.x. View

11.

Siar C, Toh C, Romanos G, Swaminathan D, Ong A, Yaacob H . Peri-implant soft tissue integration of immediately loaded implants in the posterior macaque mandible: a histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2003; 74(5):571-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.571. View

12.

Lim H, Choi Y, Evans C, Hwang H . Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(5):528-32. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq122. View

13.

Zhang L, Zhao Z, Li Y, Wu J, Zheng L, Tang T . Osseointegration of orthodontic micro-screws after immediate and early loading. Angle Orthod. 2009; 80(2):354-60. PMC: 8973229. DOI: 10.2319/021909-106.1. View

14.

Branemark P . Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50(3):399-410. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(83)80101-2. View

15.

Buchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, Wiesmann H, Piffko J, Meyer U . Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16(4):473-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01149.x. View

16.

Ma J, Zhang W, Wang L, Zhao C, Chen W . Stability and bone response of immediately loaded micro-implants in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(5):885-90. View

17.

Cehreli S, Arman-Ozcirpici A . Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141(2):187-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.020. View

18.

Zhao L, Xu Z, Yang Z, Wei X, Tang T, Zhao Z . Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108(2):196-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.023. View

19.

Yano S, Motoyoshi M, Uemura M, Ono A, Shimizu N . Tapered orthodontic miniscrews induce bone-screw cohesion following immediate loading. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28(6):541-6. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl044. View

20.

Papadopoulos M, Tarawneh F . The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(5):e6-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.022. View