» Articles » PMID: 25005924

Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: a Review of the Literature

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Jul 10
PMID 25005924
Citations 335
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns.

Objective: Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs, which covered the period 2001-2008, we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009-2012.

Methods: This paper systematically reviews health-related DCEs published between 2009 and 2012, using the same database as the earlier published review (PubMed) to obtain citations, and the same range of search terms.

Results: A total of 179 health-related DCEs for 2009-2012 met the inclusion criteria for the review. We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries. However, the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed, whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration. The trend towards using more flexible econometric models, including mixed logit and latent class, has also continued. Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods, but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors, or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores, has increased, although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined. The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE designs and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results. However, qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection, which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project.

Conclusions: The use of DCEs in healthcare continues to grow dramatically, as does the scope of applications across an expanding range of countries. There is increasing evidence that more sophisticated approaches to DCE design and analytical techniques are improving the quality of final outputs. That said, recent evidence that the use of qualitative methods to inform attribute selection has declined is of concern.

Citing Articles

Incorporating discrete choice experiments into long-term care insurance policy decisions: evidence from China.

Chen Q, Dong Y, Lyu X Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1511001.

PMID: 40041181 PMC: 11876386. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511001.


The employment preferences of young people in Canada: a discrete choice experiment.

Woodgate R, Isaak C, Witt J, Tennent P, Bell A BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):715.

PMID: 39979833 PMC: 11844131. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21515-y.


Patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment: a preference heterogeneity assessment.

Saldarriaga E, Hauber B, Barthold D, Brah A, Tran J, Marconi V BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):237.

PMID: 39972307 PMC: 11841254. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10546-w.


Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.

Veisi M, Daroudi R, Kordi R, Akbari Sari A Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025; 38:125.

PMID: 39968477 PMC: 11835406. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.38.125.


Outcome preferences in fidelity-adaptation scenarios across evidence-based parenting programs: A discrete choice experiment.

Pettersson K, Millroth P, Giannotta F, Liedgren P, Lyon A, Hasson H Implement Sci. 2025; 20(1):10.

PMID: 39966975 PMC: 11837681. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01421-y.


References
1.
Oteng B, Marra F, Lynd L, Ogilvie G, Patrick D, Marra C . Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme. Sex Transm Infect. 2010; 87(1):52-7. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.041392. View

2.
Regier D, Diorio C, Ethier M, Alli A, Alexander S, Boydell K . Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric oncology. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47470. PMC: 3474806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047470. View

3.
MacNeil Vroomen J, Zweifel P . Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?. Eur J Health Econ. 2010; 12(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-010-0248-0. View

4.
Ozdemir S, Reed Johnson F, Hauber A . Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. J Health Econ. 2009; 28(4):894-901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.04.004. View

5.
Howard K, Salkeld G . Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2008; 12(2):354-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00417.x. View