» Articles » PMID: 25002859

Effect of Auditory Constraints on Motor Performance Depends on Stage of Recovery Post-stroke

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jul 9
PMID 25002859
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to develop evidence-based rehabilitation protocols post-stroke, one must first reconcile the vast heterogeneity in the post-stroke population and develop protocols to facilitate motor learning in the various subgroups. The main purpose of this study is to show that auditory constraints interact with the stage of recovery post-stroke to influence motor learning. We characterized the stages of upper limb recovery using task-based kinematic measures in 20 subjects with chronic hemiparesis. We used a bimanual wrist extension task, performed with a custom-made wrist trainer, to facilitate learning of wrist extension in the paretic hand under four auditory conditions: (1) without auditory cueing; (2) to non-musical happy sounds; (3) to self-selected music; and (4) to a metronome beat set at a comfortable tempo. Two bimanual trials (15 s each) were followed by one unimanual trial with the paretic hand over six cycles under each condition. Clinical metrics, wrist and arm kinematics, and electromyographic activity were recorded. Hierarchical cluster analysis with the Mahalanobis metric based on baseline speed and extent of wrist movement stratified subjects into three distinct groups, which reflected their stage of recovery: spastic paresis, spastic co-contraction, and minimal paresis. In spastic paresis, the metronome beat increased wrist extension, but also increased muscle co-activation across the wrist. In contrast, in spastic co-contraction, no auditory stimulation increased wrist extension and reduced co-activation. In minimal paresis, wrist extension did not improve under any condition. The results suggest that auditory task constraints interact with stage of recovery during motor learning after stroke, perhaps due to recruitment of distinct neural substrates over the course of recovery. The findings advance our understanding of the mechanisms of progression of motor recovery and lay the foundation for personalized treatment algorithms post-stroke.

Citing Articles

Improvisation and live accompaniment increase motor response and reward during a music playing task.

Palumbo A, Groves K, Munoz-Vidal E, Turry A, Codio R, Raghavan P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13112.

PMID: 38849348 PMC: 11161496. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62794-6.


Validity of the telematic Fugl Meyer assessment scale - upper extremity (TFMA-UE) Spanish version.

Llamas-Ramos R, Llamas-Ramos I, Perez-Robledo F, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Bermejo-Gil B, Frutos-Bernal E Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1226192.

PMID: 37638200 PMC: 10449578. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226192.


Identifying the role of the reticulospinal tract for strength and motor recovery: A scoping review of nonhuman and human studies.

Akalu Y, Frazer A, Howatson G, Pearce A, Siddique U, Rostami M Physiol Rep. 2023; 11(14):e15765.

PMID: 37474275 PMC: 10359156. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15765.


Immediate and short-term effects of continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation over contralesional premotor area on post-stroke spasticity in patients with severe hemiplegia: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Wei X, Xia N, Li Y, Gu M, Zhang T, Gao W Front Neurol. 2022; 13:895580.

PMID: 36081877 PMC: 9445437. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.895580.


Corrigendum: Expertise-Related Differences in Wrist Muscle Co-contraction in Drummers.

Beveridge S, Herff S, Buck B, Breaden Madden G, Jabusch H Front Psychol. 2021; 12:706228.

PMID: 34367031 PMC: 8343458. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706228.


References
1.
Crow J, Harmeling-van der Wel B . Hierarchical properties of the motor function sections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for people after stroke: a retrospective study. Phys Ther. 2008; 88(12):1554-67. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070186. View

2.
Sternad D, Wei K, Diedrichsen J, Ivry R . Intermanual interactions during initiation and production of rhythmic and discrete movements in individuals lacking a corpus callosum. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 176(4):559-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0640-2. View

3.
Michaelsen S, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin M . Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2001; 32(8):1875-83. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1875. View

4.
Bowden M, Woodbury M, Duncan P . Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012; 26(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5ba0. View

5.
Luft A, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester L, Macko R, Sorkin J . Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 292(15):1853-61. PMC: 2930817. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.15.1853. View