» Articles » PMID: 25000785

Training to Improve Stockperson Beliefs and Behaviour Towards Livestock Enhances Welfare and Productivity

Overview
Journal Rev Sci Tech
Date 2014 Jul 9
PMID 25000785
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The principle that supervising and managing animals affects farm animal welfare is widely recognised within the livestock industries. However,the manner in which the stockperson affects animal welfare, both directly and indirectly, is probably not fully appreciated. Together with the opportunity to perform their tasks well, stockpeople require a range of well-developed husbandry skills and knowledge to effectively care for and manage farm animals. There are three main factors that can be considered to contribute to a stockperson's work performance: capacity, willingness and opportunity. Capacity includes variables such as skills, health, ability and knowledge, while willingness includes motivation, job satisfaction, attitude to the animals and work attitude, and opportunity includes working conditions, actions of co-workers and organisational policies and rules. This paper briefly reviews the influence of the stockperson on livestock welfare and productivity and the opportunities to improve the stockperson's performance through training. It is clear that there is a continuing need for livestock industries to train their personnel to effectively care for and handle their stock. Underestimating the role and impact of the stockperson will seriously risk the welfare and productivity of livestock. Indeed, the stockperson may be the most influential factor affecting animal handling, welfare and productivity. Furthermore, it is likely that, in the near future, both the livestock industries and the general community will place an increasing emphasis on ensuring the competency of stockpeople to manage the welfare of livestock.

Citing Articles

Perceptions of swine euthanasia among Brazilian caretakers from non-integrated swine farms.

Alves L, Pairis-Garcia M, Arruda A, de Melo C, Gomes N, Hoshino R Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11():1513141.

PMID: 39834925 PMC: 11743181. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1513141.


Expanding perspectives and understanding relational potential: Are mutually beneficial human-animal relationships compatible with current animal agricultural practices?.

Ryan E, Weary D, Zobel G, Webster J, Higgins E, Franks B Anim Welf. 2025; 33():e63.

PMID: 39777368 PMC: 11704569. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.62.


Influences on Perceived Feasibility of Animal-Based Measures in a Producer-Driven Welfare Benchmarking System.

Salvin H, Monk J, Cafe L, Harden S, Lee C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335256 PMC: 11429234. DOI: 10.3390/ani14182666.


Are there risk factors commonly observed on Australian farms where the welfare of livestock is poor?.

Williams N, Hemsworth L, Chaplin S, Shephard R, Fisher A Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e34.

PMID: 39315351 PMC: 11418073. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.27.


Human animal relationships in cattle breeds addressed from a Five Domains welfare framework.

Mota-Rojas D, Whittaker A, Strappini A, Orihuela A, Dominguez-Oliva A, Mora-Medina P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1456120.

PMID: 39290508 PMC: 11405345. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1456120.