» Articles » PMID: 24998464

Intraprocedural Cleansing Work During Colonoscopy and Achievable Rates of Adequate Preparation in an Open-access Endoscopy Unit

Overview
Date 2014 Jul 8
PMID 24998464
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rates of adequate bowel preparation in the 60% to 80% range continue to be reported for colonoscopy.

Objective: To describe the rate of adequate bowel preparation and intraprocedural work needed to achieve this rate in an open-access endoscopy unit. Universal split dosing and regimens tailored to medical predictors of inadequate preparation were used.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Academic hospital outpatient endoscopy unit and ambulatory surgery center.

Patients: Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy.

Interventions: Prospective assessment of preparation quality for colonoscopy during insertion and after intraprocedural cleansing in 525 patients.

Main Outcome Measurements: Rates of adequate preparation and work required to improve cleansing quality. Work time for cleaning was measured with a stopwatch.

Results: Adequate preparation to allow recommendation of standard screening or surveillance intervals was achieved in 96% of patients, including 6% for whom preparation was adequate only after intraprocedural cleansing work. The mean time for intraprocedural cleaning was 4.1 minutes and constituted 17% of total procedure time. Work time for cleaning and fluid volume injected increased when worse preparation grades were identified before cleaning.

Limitations: Single-center study with low percentage (4%) of patients receiving Medicaid.

Conclusion: An open-access unit using split-dose bowel cleansing preparations can achieve high rates of adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Intraprocedural cleansing accounts for a substantial fraction of the total procedure time in colonoscopy and is an important contributor to high rates of adequate preparation.

Citing Articles

An intraprocedural bowel cleansing system for difficult-to-prepare patients-A multicenter prospective feasibility study.

van Riswijk M, van Keulen K, Neumann H, Siersema P United European Gastroenterol J. 2024; 12(1):56-65.

PMID: 38213079 PMC: 10859716. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12501.


Key quality indicators in colonoscopy.

Rex D Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023; 11:goad009.

PMID: 36911141 PMC: 10005623. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad009.


A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution.

Bachwich D, Lewis J, Kowal V, Jacobson B, Calderwood A, Kochman M Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021; 11(12):e00264.

PMID: 33512795 PMC: 7678801. DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000264.


Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials.

Wang C, Yang R, Hookey L J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020; 3(3):111-119.

PMID: 32395685 PMC: 7204808. DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070.


Multicentre endoscopist-blinded randomised clinical trial to compare two bowel preparations after a colonoscopy with inadequate cleansing: a study protocol.

Sey M, von Renteln D, Sultanian R, McDonald C, Martel M, Barkun A BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7):e029573.

PMID: 31289092 PMC: 6629449. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029573.