» Articles » PMID: 24995410

Benchmarking of Dynamic Simulation Predictions in Two Software Platforms Using an Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Model

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2014 Jul 5
PMID 24995410
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several opensource or commercially available software platforms are widely used to develop dynamic simulations of movement. While computational approaches are conceptually similar across platforms, technical differences in implementation may influence output. We present a new upper limb dynamic model as a tool to evaluate potential differences in predictive behavior between platforms. We evaluated to what extent differences in technical implementations in popular simulation software environments result in differences in kinematic predictions for single and multijoint movements using EMG- and optimization-based approaches for deriving control signals. We illustrate the benchmarking comparison using SIMM-Dynamics Pipeline-SD/Fast and OpenSim platforms. The most substantial divergence results from differences in muscle model and actuator paths. This model is a valuable resource and is available for download by other researchers. The model, data, and simulation results presented here can be used by future researchers to benchmark other software platforms and software upgrades for these two platforms.

Citing Articles

Potential of Individual Upper-Limb Muscles to Contribute to Postural Tremor: Simulations From Neural Drive to Joint Rotation.

Baker S, Beutler L, Free D, Farina D, Charles S Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2025; 15:7.

PMID: 40027118 PMC: 11869822. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.949.


Research on Upper Limb Motion Intention Classification and Rehabilitation Robot Control Based on sEMG.

Song T, Zhang K, Yan Z, Li Y, Guo S, Li X Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006285 PMC: 11859407. DOI: 10.3390/s25041057.


Role and modulation of various spinal pathways for human upper limb control in different gravity conditions.

Bruel A, Bacha L, Boehly E, De Trogoff C, Represa L, Courtine G PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(1):e1012069.

PMID: 39761279 PMC: 11737853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012069.


An Efficient Framework for Personalizing EMG-Driven Musculoskeletal Models Based on Reinforcement Learning.

Berman J, Lee I, Yin J, Huang H IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:4174-4185.

PMID: 39437284 PMC: 11875965. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3483150.


Multibody dynamics-based musculoskeletal modeling for gait analysis: a systematic review.

Abdullah M, Hulleck A, Katmah R, Khalaf K, El-Rich M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):178.

PMID: 39369227 PMC: 11452939. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01458-y.


References
1.
Wu G, van der Helm F, Veeger H, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):981-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042. View

2.
Zajac F . Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989; 17(4):359-411. View

3.
Wagner D, Stepanyan V, Shippen J, DeMers M, Gibbons R, Andrews B . Consistency among musculoskeletal models: caveat utilitor. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41(8):1787-99. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0843-1. View

4.
Ruby L, Cooney 3rd W, An K, Linscheid R, Chao E . Relative motion of selected carpal bones: a kinematic analysis of the normal wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 1988; 13(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(88)90189-x. View

5.
Lloyd D, Besier T . An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech. 2003; 36(6):765-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00010-1. View